Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Where you looked at what people did with The Web 2.0 and only marveled at the possibilities of what could come. Truly feels like the death of one of the old guard, a Usenet-of-the-2010s. This is funny to me, because I am old enough to remember when web 2.0 was new, and people were nostalgic for 'web 1.0'. (And, of course, it's turtles all the way down with nostalgia.)
> it's turtles all the way down with nostalgia. And yet golden eras do occur, or so it would seem. I’m sure it’s hard to tell when you’re in or near one, which is an interesting topic in its own right, but it doesn’t mean we should dismiss outright the possibility that a passing era might just be taking something truly valuable with it.
Omegle 2009-2023
651–660 of 1001 posts
Re: Omegle 2009-2023
#652> But it became popular almost instantly after launch, and grew organically from there, reaching millions of daily users. The law of big numbers dictate that if there’s even a tiny chance of a catastrophic event it has close to 100% probability of happening if n is just large enough (in the case of millions of daily users, probably multiple catastrophic events per day). This kind of asymmetrical risk is very hard to…
Just because someone got struck by lightning while playing golf, doesn’t make golf dangerous to play.
Re: Omegle 2009-2023
#653Re: Omegle 2009-2023
#654Earlier quoted context omitted.
Even a non-golden era can have something truly valuable. Btw, we are living in a golden age. The vast majority of humanity has never had it better.
That's a bit simplistic. If you haven't noticed, advanced economies are experiencing secularly stagnating growth, a crisis of democratic representation and its populist backlash, the return of oligarchic inequality to levels not seen since the gilded age, and extreme social atomisation and mental health breakdown. We are also all hurtling towards catastrophic climate change, an AI revolution that could lead to genera…
Is growth really what we should care about though? Would you prefer to live in a poor society that's growing rapidly, or a rich society that's stagnating? In terms of your quality of life (medical, food, housing, education, etc.) you're going to have a better time in the stagnant-but-rich society.
The American economy is actually doing super well right now btw: https://www.noahpinion.blog/p/great-news-about-american-weal...
Re: Omegle 2009-2023
#655Earlier quoted context omitted.
Is it something from a long time ago or did you manage to do that in recent years too? Just curious.
In the last 3 months, I managed to meet at least one example for all nine types of people I gave. Used tags: politics, constitution, trump, reddit, liberal, conservative, democrat, republican, philosophy, music, compsci, computers, socialmedia, debate, ama, business, america (I found that these tags made for the best conversations over the years. None of them stand as an endorsement)
Re: Omegle 2009-2023
#656Re: Omegle 2009-2023
#657Omegle was always a horny and abusive place and a place that was so very skin colour sensitive (as usual this skipped the discourse). Pretty much nothing else. I am amused by the mentions of magical place people are lamenting. Besides it was a direct copy of Chatroulette. But I understand. It’s always the case - one’s revolutionary is another’s terrorist.
Re: Omegle 2009-2023
#658Earlier quoted context omitted.
I didn’t use Omegle much, but I actually met my now wife on there. We used the text only thing where a third person suggests a topic. Must’ve talked for a good 2 hours on there before exchanging informations, I shudder thinking that even the smallest glitch could have changed my life so drastically. We met 11 years ago on the platform, a completely random fluke. And while I haven’t really used Omegle in a long time,…
For people who are looking for this -- It's a common refrain on Twitter that Twitter can be a better dating app than actual dating apps. I think the mechanism here is similar -- both Twitter and Omegle encourage a sort of stream-of-consciousness, semi-anonymous communication style that facilitates soul entwinement.
This encouraged her to read my blog then to get in touch, etc…
So meeting my wife happened because:
1. There was a terrorist attack 2. I tweeted about it 3. The tweet became popular 4. A random someone took the time to screenshot it to share it on Facebook 5. That random screenshot managed to get through my future wife timeline.
To this day, when I look at my son, I wonder how odds were that he exists.
(I told the story in French here for those really curious: https://ploum.net/comment-les-reseaux-sociaux-ont-transforme... )
Re: Omegle 2009-2023
#659Re: Omegle 2009-2023
#660Earlier quoted context omitted.
The owner is currently being sued by a woman who used the site as a minor and was matched with a pedophile who convinced her to make and send CSAM. This isn't the usual kind of "CSAM intermediary liablility" lawsuit; the plaintiff is actually making an ordinary product liability claim. i.e. Omegle has no safety bars to keep kids from using the service ergo they are liable for me being abused by an adult. https://www.…
That seems nuts to me. It's just a generic venue for people meeting people, like a cafe that happens to be online. To me that makes as much sense as suing a cafe because you met somebody there who talked you into illegal activities.