There are agents in this thread with very vested interests it seems...
Australia’s new mass surveillance mandate
651–660 of 894 posts
Re: Australia’s new mass surveillance mandate
#652Earlier quoted context omitted.
>> rather than stay at a quarantine facility. Nobody is being forced to use the app. Download the app or we send you to a camp? That isn't much of a choice. I'd say it is about as non-choice as possible while still meeting the literal definition.
I'll say what I said on the other thread - If you want to present an argument against quarantine being needed or warranted, please go ahead. Checking in on the app is the least intrusive of the three options - quarantine under guard (usually in a hotel, like the one I'm in right now), quarantine at home with police visits tio ensure compliance, or quarantine at home checking in to the app once or twice a day. In this…
Re: Australia’s new mass surveillance mandate
#653Earlier quoted context omitted.
There's a ton of countries that just trusts its people to quarantine without the government checking on them.
When it all started in February 2020 that's exactly what Australia was doing, but a minority could not be trusted and broke quarantine and consequently COVID started spreading. At that point the model changed to mandatory quarantine in a government facility. There was broad community support for that change. In an ideal world people would have liked to have stuck with the voluntary approach, but most were realistic e…
It's one way that if you look at history minorities have also been identified.
Scapegoat behaviour from the crowd is a response to senseless suffering and pain. It actually makes those who scapegoat others feel better and people want to feel better. Why would anyone volunteer to feel worse? Most people don't have empathy for those who scapegoat others but the pandemic is a great way to see this happening at various stages in real time across the world. Some countries don't have any, others more, some loads, some vary according to lockdown severity, others don't.
How can one blame an invisible virus or an abstract political decision when humans traditionally blame each other?
What's the end result if you buy into scapegoating as a personal psychological tactic? We will find out.
Re: Australia’s new mass surveillance mandate
#654Re: Australia’s new mass surveillance mandate
#655Earlier quoted context omitted.
This talk about "Draconian" lockdown in Australia needs to stop. Our privacy and digital rights laws are awful. But the lockdowns are necessary. NSW had upward of 1000+ cases and that's why they're (still) in a strict lockdown. QLD and i beleive WA as well for example are not in lockdown at all because of their much much lower daily cases. Also, "50 cases in a nation of millions"? I dont know where you're getting you…
>This talk about "Draconian" lockdown in Australia needs to stop. I haven't been following the lockdown laws interstate, but here in Victoria there have definitely been some restrictions that seemed to be extremely harsh and soul-crushing in comparison to their effectiveness at stopping the virus. The 5km radius and curfew both spring to mind. I (legally) haven't been able to see a single friend or family member for…
Re: Australia’s new mass surveillance mandate
#656Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'll say what I said on the other thread - If you want to present an argument against quarantine being needed or warranted, please go ahead. Checking in on the app is the least intrusive of the three options - quarantine under guard (usually in a hotel, like the one I'm in right now), quarantine at home with police visits tio ensure compliance, or quarantine at home checking in to the app once or twice a day. In this…
>> present an argument against I don't. My comment was to the nature of the "choice" not whether or not the mandate was warranted. Let's not pretend that people have options when they really don't. There is no need to dress it up. In times of disease, governments do sometimes order people to do things. Let's not kid ourselves. Personal choice, personal freedom, is set aside.
Re: Australia’s new mass surveillance mandate
#657Earlier quoted context omitted.
> In some like the UK, that trust was misplaced, and compliance with isolation rules was under 50%. More like, people in the UK more correctly assessed the risk of COVID. While is a dangerous disease, it's not so dangerous that it is worth giving up all of your civil rights to avoid it. In Australia the cure seems to be worse than the disease.
I've had to do a 14 day quarantine in the UK at home, and frankly, it was a bit of a joke. Literally no one has ever checked we were actually at home, the amount of trust in the population is insane over here. We actually stayed at home the entire time, but I know people who didn't, they had to go to work to make a living and the fine was like a £100. In contrast, in Poland if you are told to quarantine you will get…
I came by train from Berlin. The rules were to have a negative test not older than 24hs and to quarantine after arrival. No one ever checked. Go figure.
This happened: Thursday evening, just after I arrived, my host said: let's go to tango (we are social tango dancers).
We drove to a (previously) regular event which is in a park in Warsaw, close to the center, that weekday. It was on as if nothing had ever happened.
I know the tango scene in Warsaw a bit. Everyone was there. All the familiar faces. About 80-100 people. And even some people who live like 100km away. I couldn't believe it.
Dancers I talked to there told me this was going on for months. "Basically there never was a lockdown for social dancers." they said. "At the beginning you had to register for 'classes' but as soon as the doors were closed it was a normal dancing event. No masks, no distancing etc."
Restaurants were not allowed to open at the time. So what happened Friday was straight out of a movie.
We drove to a brand new residential building in a side street. Approaching it the door opened and woman in a black mini dress welcomed us. Immediately checking our names on a list.
Once she had found us two thugs in tailored suits who would befit the extras list of any action summer blockbuster appeared behind her; out of nowhere.
Inside they escorted us to an entrance next to the building's elevators that led through a narrow hallway, past a busy restaurant kitchen into a top notch Italian joint.
No one wore a mask but amazingly only every 2nd table was being used. There was a DJ in the middle and my friend told me: "This turns into a private club from around 10:30pm."
The front side windows had blinds that were tightly shut. From the outside the restaurant must have looked completely shut down.
After dinner, at around 11pm, my friend suggested we go to a (real) club. But we had to wait for at least 30mins, he said.
Because the police were blocking the back door through which we entered -- waiting for their cut. As they did every night at 11pm.
I asked him how he'd know. He said: "I spoke to the owner when this happened before and we couldn't leave."
The owner and the head waitress were pulling together the evening's proceedings on a tablet. Then they stuffed an envelope. My friend told me he had asked the owner and the police would expect to pocket 10% of the evening's earnings.
And they they wanted to see the proceedings on the tablet.
When we exited the building through the side street entrance again, at around 11:30pm, the police car just pulled out in front of us.
The club we went to afterwards was also in an old residential building in the center. Through a narrow old door into a wide, low ceiling hallway leading to the yard. Stuffed with rubble and old bicycles.
In the middle of the side of the hallway a narrow stairway leading down to the basement.
About 300 young guests, seemingly drunk, in a space of maybe 300sqm -- minus bars & toilets. It was so crowded you couldn't drop to the floor if you lost your balance.
I wasn't ok to enter there so went to my friend's house instead but I saw it for maybe 30 secs.
So Poland, yeah. Maybe someone got fined 30k PLN for breaking some COVID rules. Maybe.
Re: Australia’s new mass surveillance mandate
#658Earlier quoted context omitted.
Like the UK, where compliance has been estimated at around 40%?
When the alternative is invasive, Orwellian monitoring and inhumane enforcement by an authoritarian state, I'll take 40% compliance every time. Remember... governments NEVER give up these powers readily.
The West had massively draconian laws during the last similar protracted existential problem, WW2, and gave them up just fine when it finished.
Re: Australia’s new mass surveillance mandate
#659Earlier quoted context omitted.
So much to unpack here... Until recently, Victoria has managed to bring all previous outbreaks to zero. COVID zero works until other states started undermining said goal in the name of business. By saving NSW businesses 3 weeks of not locking down, they've geniously bought themselves 2 months and counting of lockdowns along with high highest number COVID ever seen in Australia. > We aren’t just economic fuel to be bu…
This isn't a partisan thing, the liberal/authoritarian axis is independent from the collectivist/individualist axis. I'm against authoritarianism full stop , I don't care about the other policies sold alongside authoritarianism. Trying to tar me as right-wing for being anti-authoritarian is ignorant at best and deliberately misleading at worst. Zero covid is a fool's errand unless you want to be a North Korea-style h…
This is exactly the strategy in Australia, from all states and territories. We're last in the OECD in population vaccinations and so COVID-zero via lockdowns are our only strategy until jab rates get to 80% (of people above 16).
Re: Australia’s new mass surveillance mandate
#660I've lived to see this kind of thing enacted in a good portion of the Anglosphere and my visceral reaction is to engage in a combination of civil disobedience and a determination to undermine every overstep made. With regards to things like the Aussie requirement for phone check-ins every 15 minutes or they will deploy police to follow up and confirm your location, turn off the phone and make them eat the cost of hav…
You seem to be referring to the South Australia Home Quarantine app [1]. There has been a lot of misinformation circulating about this app recently. I'd just like to clear up some things: The app only applies to people that need to quarantine, not the general population. The app allows people who are required to isolate to opt to do their isolation at home, rather than stay at a quarantine facility. Nobody is being f…
No where else in the world is cracking down like this (AFAIK, maybe China?)
This is totally abusing a crisis to gain handover people and using "safety" as justification.