https://blog.thehomeshare.com/were-on-a-mission-to-make-citi...
New Cities
651–660 of 710 posts
Re: New Cities
#652Earlier quoted context omitted.
Cars have a place in cities but maybe they should be in tunnels underground or something. I view money locked up in real estate as money in a very suboptimal place. We pay too much 'rent' in general; it'd be far better to try to make housing/office space cheap and have people invest the extra money in productive assets.
Rent is the measure of the success of a city; rent is high where people want to be. Saying you'll make "cheap housing" where people will nonetheless want to be is complete nonsense. If people want to live there the rent will go up; the only way to make the rent low is to make the place utterly undesirable.
Re: New Cities
#653You could then have a system of self driving busses that people could order with a smartphone, and then find the most efficient route to get everyone where they want to go. And then you have minimally congested streets that are very pedestrian friendly.
In fact you don't need self driving vehicles to accomplish this even. A human pilot following instructions from a computer that calculates the optimal route. The point is you can get public transportation without the downside of fixed routes.
Anyway, along other recommendations people have given, look at this site. I've always been fascinated with it: http://www.newworldeconomics.com/ Especially this article on Toledo, Ohio vs Toledo, Spain: http://www.newworldeconomics.com/archives/2010/022110.html
Re: New Cities
#654Re: New Cities
#655Earlier quoted context omitted.
Changing the way cars function inside the city is only part of what would need to change. Near me things just aren't laid out well for pedestrians. It would take me about an hour to walk to the nearest grocery store (not counting corner stores, because all they sell is junk food). Biking should be much shorter, though I can't say I've ever tried. We would need to stop the trend of having a small number of large store…
> It would take me about an hour to walk to the nearest grocery store (not counting corner stores, because all they sell is junk food). There's a bigger issue here. Suppose the grocery store was 10 minutes away. You'd still need to drive there, because how are you going to get the food back to your house? I have lived carless and had to make many independent trips per week to buy food. Being able to do it all at once…
Re: New Cities
#656Earlier quoted context omitted.
You sound like you are justifying your own choices with a strawman argument about what it's like to own a car. My annual maintenance costs + insurance + licensing on my 15 year old car are about the same cost as renting a car for two days. I think you vastly overestimate the cost of owning an older car. Im also not sure you understand the term flexibility in the way most people do. Right now (as in within 10 minutes)…
Your point about taking your car and heading to Tahoe and Yosemite, strictly speaking, is correct. However, speaking only for myself, I do not find it particularly urgent to make long-distance trips - presumably for leisure - within ten minutes of making the decision. The bigger question is - why is it strictly necessarily to have to use it for ten minutes - just to get milk ? And while most places in the US simply d…
Great if you live on a route popular enough that they do that. You are screwed otherwise. Even if you do live on a popular route, it also doesn't solve the problem if you want to go somewhere unpopular.
>I do not find it particularly urgent to make long-distance trips - presumably for leisure - within ten minutes of making the decision.
Good for you, but not that relevant for people that do. Waking up Saturday morning and deciding to drive out to a destination like this, spend the night, and then drive back the next day is not considered unreasonable.
>The bigger question is - why is it strictly necessarily to have to use it for ten minutes - just to get milk?
Because I need milk for a recipe I just found online and I don't want to wait 15 minutes for the next train, ride for 10 minutes, shop for 5 minutes, wait 15 minutes for the return train, and then ride for 10 minutes. And those times even generously assume I live right on a stop and there is a store right on a stop.
Re: New Cities
#657Re: New Cities
#658Earlier quoted context omitted.
Cars underground is a great idea but you'd need to find a way to make GPS work, especially since GPS is necessary for autonomous cars which are obviously a thing of the future.
I'm sorry: what is it about cars underground that is a terrific idea when it costs more than the moon to build a tunnel these days?
Re: New Cities
#659The health and longevity of its citizens.
> How should we measure the effectiveness of a city (what are its KPIs)?
Minimizing disease, mortality, poverty, and crime.
> What values should (or should not) be embedded in a city's culture?
Active lifestyle, minimalism… courtesy, respect, appreciation of fellow citizens. Volunteerism.
> How can cities help more of their residents be happy and reach their potential?
People get jealous of each other very easily. Cultures that don’t promote the flaunting of wealth tend to be happier. The two most conspicuous examples of excessive consumption are large homes and expensive cars. As advanced primates we’re most comfortable in moderately forested land with ample water. Above all this, people require a safe place to live so effective means of crime deterrent are critical. Once the base of Maslow’s hierarchy is met, people will actualize on their own.
> How can we encourage a diverse range of people to live and work in the city?
If you build it they will come. It’s really that simple. There’s no magic formula, a diverse range of people is required to run a city.
> How should citizens guide and participate in government?
Citizens should enumerate the authorities of their leadership rather than allowing leadership all authorities not specifically excluded.
> How can we make sure a city is constantly evolving and always open to change?
It’s psychologically easier to move away from a rental than an owned unit. I know there is dogma about the financial security around home ownership, but leasing a residential unit is really not all that different from renting the money to buy a unit. So I think severely restricting or eliminating traditional home “ownership” might keep the population ready for quick changes.
> How can we make and keep housing affordable? This is critical to us; the cost of housing affects everything else in a city.
By restricting/eliminating outright ownership and zoning out excessively large units or charging progressively more per square foot for larger constructions (on a per occupant basis).
> How can we lay out the public and private spaces (and roads) to make a great place to live? Can we figure out better zoning laws?
Priority should be given first to the natural spaces, followed by living spaces, then the sidewalks, and bikeways/waterways. The automobile roads should be relegated to the outskirts of the city in an exterior loop with limited access to the interior for critical functions. Zoning out excessively large homes is critical.
> What is the right role for vehicles in a city? Should we have human-driven cars at all?
Probably shouldn’t have many human-driven cars in the city aside from possibly emergency responders. The vehicles should be utilized to serve human needs rather than display status of the owners.
> How can we have affordable high-speed transit to and from other cities?
The hyperloop sounds most promising right now. Musk is a modern day Midas.
> How can we make rules and regulations that are comprehensive while also being easily understandable? Can we fit all rules for the city in 100 pages of text?
Arbitration agreements and waivers for all residents. Not sure about the rules. I suspect that most cities are already subject to enough state/federal rules to require little in the way of local ordinances. We might look for the shortest examples on municode.com for inspiration.
> What effects will the new city have on the surrounding community?
People who are able to relocate are more likely to be young and depending on the success of the city it may attract the most talented. Prosperous cities have a way of draining the brains of surrounding communities. On positive note, former residents tend to benefit the previous communities when they return/visit.
Re: New Cities
#660I have always really liked stuff from https://www.thevenusproject.com/ some of their ideas might seem crazyish but overall I think anybody thinking about designing new cities ought to at least take a look.