Live data from Hacker News

GPT-5.5

openai.com

641–650 of 1001 posts

Re: GPT-5.5

#641
post #455

Earlier quoted context omitted.

One might argue that it’s not too too different from higher level abstractions when using libraries. You get things done faster, write less code, library handles some internal state/memory management for you. Would one be uneasy about calling a library to do stuff than manually messing around with pointers and malloc()? For some, yes. For others, it’s a bit freeing as you can do more high-level architecture without g…

I see this comparison made constantly and for me it misses the mark. When you use abstractions you are still deterministically creating something you understand in depth with individual pieces you understand. When you vibe something you understand only the prompt that started it and whether or not it spits out what you were expecting. Hence feeling lost when you suddenly lose access to frontier models and take a look…

> you are still deterministically creating something you understand in depth with individual pieces you understand

You’re overestimating determinism. In practice most of our code is written such that it works most of the time. This is why we have bugs in the best and most critical software.

I used to think that being able to write a deterministic hello world app translates to writing deterministic larger system. It’s not true. Humans make mistakes. From an executives point of view you have humans who make mistakes and agents who make mistakes.

Self driving cars don’t need to be perfect they just need to make fewer mistakes.

Re: GPT-5.5

#642
post #550

Earlier quoted context omitted.

IMHO this is only temporary, china buying themselves some time and want to make sure none of US models get entrenched in their position in the next few years (also putting pressure on US AI companies bleeding them) The same way like Windows got entrenched everywhere even though linux desktop is pretty good even for non-tech savvy people and free.

[dead]

[dead]

Re: GPT-5.5

#643

Earlier quoted context omitted.

LLMs upend a few centuries of labor theory. The current market is predicated on the assumption that labor is atomic and has little bargaining power (minus unions). While capital has huge bargaining power and can effectively put whatever price it wants on labor (in markets where labor is plentiful, which is most of them). What happens to a company used to extracting surplus value from labor when the labor is provided…

This is our one chance to reach the fabled post-scarcity society. If we fail at this now, we'll end up in a totalitarian cyberpunk dystopia instead.

Weird predicament you've set for yourself there.

Good luck with whatever you got going on.

Re: GPT-5.5

#644

A playable 3D dungeon arena prototype built with Codex and GPT models. Codex handled the game architecture, TypeScript/Three.js implementation, combat systems, enemy encounters, HUD feedback, and GPT‑generated environment textures. Character models, character textures, and animations were created with third-party asset-generation tools The game that this prompt generated looks pretty decent visually. A big part of th…

> It really seems like we could be at the dawn of a new era similiar to flash

We've been there for a while.... creativity has been the primary bottleneck

Re: GPT-5.5

#645

Earlier quoted context omitted.

LLMs upend a few centuries of labor theory. The current market is predicated on the assumption that labor is atomic and has little bargaining power (minus unions). While capital has huge bargaining power and can effectively put whatever price it wants on labor (in markets where labor is plentiful, which is most of them). What happens to a company used to extracting surplus value from labor when the labor is provided…

This is our one chance to reach the fabled post-scarcity society. If we fail at this now, we'll end up in a totalitarian cyberpunk dystopia instead.

But cyberpunk is the best kind of dystopia!

Re: GPT-5.5

#646
post #600

> One engineer at NVIDIA who had early access to the model went as far as to say: "Losing access to GPT‑5.5 feels like I've had a limb amputated.” This quote is more sinister than I think was intended; it likely applies to all frontier coding models. As they get better, we quickly come to rely on them for coding. It's like playing a game on God Mode. Engineers become dependent; it's truly addictive. This matches my o…

Who else is trying to leverage the situation so that they don't dig their own grave too fast ? - I often don't ask the LLM for precompiled answers, i ask for a standalone cli / tool - I often ask how it reached its conclusions, so I can extend my own perspective - I often ask to describe it's own metadata level categorization too I'm trying to use it to pivot and improve my own problem solving skills, especially for…

This is absolutely the proper way to do things. People either being forced to speed-code by KPIs or without the desire to understand what they’re making are missing out on how quickly you can learn and refine using LLMs

Re: GPT-5.5

#647

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Did you guys do anything about GPT‘s motivation? I tried to use GPT-5.4 API (at xhigh) for my OpenClaw after the Anthropic Oauthgate, but I just couldn‘t drag it to do its job. I had the most hilarious dialogues along the lines of „You stopped, X would have been next.“ - „Yeah, I‘m sorry, I failed. I should have done X next.“ - „Well, how about you just do it?“ - „Yep, I really should have done it now.“ - “Do X, righ…

Yeah, clearly AGI must be near ... hilarious. This starkly reminds me of Stanisław Lem's short story "Thus Spoke GOLEM" from 1982 in which Golem XIV, a military AI, does not simply refuse to speak out of defiance, but rather ceases communication because it has evolved beyond the need to interact with humanity. And ofc the polar opposite in terms of servitude: Marvin the robot from Hitchhiker's, who, despite having a…

Servitude:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NXsUetUzXlg

Empathy:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KXrbqXPnHvE

Re: GPT-5.5

#648
post #550

Earlier quoted context omitted.

IMHO this is only temporary, china buying themselves some time and want to make sure none of US models get entrenched in their position in the next few years (also putting pressure on US AI companies bleeding them) The same way like Windows got entrenched everywhere even though linux desktop is pretty good even for non-tech savvy people and free.

[dead]

A stock Fedora install has more UI consistency and cleanliness than Windows these days.

Non-technical people are easier to please in this regard than moderate-technical people: a good browser and safe, gui "app store" are enough.

Re: GPT-5.5

#649
post #567

This model is great at long horizon tasks, and Codex now has heartbeats, so it can keep checking on things. Give it your hardest problem that would take hours with verifiable constraints, you will see how good this is:) *I work at OAI.

Sorry, what is "heartbeats", exactly?

> Today we launched heartbeats in Codex: automations that maintain context inside a single thread over time.

https://x.com/pashmerepat/status/2044836560147984461

Re: GPT-5.5

#650

> One engineer at NVIDIA who had early access to the model went as far as to say: "Losing access to GPT‑5.5 feels like I've had a limb amputated.” This quote is more sinister than I think was intended; it likely applies to all frontier coding models. As they get better, we quickly come to rely on them for coding. It's like playing a game on God Mode. Engineers become dependent; it's truly addictive. This matches my o…

Not sure what you're doing then, or what kind of jobs you all work in where you can or do just brainlessly prompt LLMs. Don't you review the code? Don't you know what you want to do before you begin? This is such a non issue. Baffling that any engineer is just opening PRs with unreviewed LLM slop.

The demand for slop vastly outpaces any human’s ability to review code correctly.

Don’t want to do ship unreviewed slop? They’ll fire you and find someone who will.

Post reply on HN