Live data from Hacker News

Claude can now search the web

anthropic.com

641–650 of 758 posts

Re: Claude can now search the web

#641
post #637
post #622

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The amount of mental gymnastics people will go through because they like a white supremacist is nuts

The amount of mental gymnastics people will go through because they dislike a controversial billionaire is nuts

I don't know man, it doesn't take many mental gymnastics here

https://xcancel.com/elonmusk/status/1724908287471272299

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/03/14/technology/elon-musk-x-po...

https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/social-media/elon-musk-x-twitte...

I could keep going but there's really no point

Re: Claude can now search the web

#642
post #633
post #102

Searching the web is a great feature in theory, but every implementation I've used so far looks at the top X hits and then interprets it to be the correct answer. When you're talking to an LLM about popular topics or common errors, the top results are often just blogspam or unresolved forum posts, so the you never get an answer to your problem. More of an indicator that web search is more unusable than ever, but inte…

>top results are blogspam It gets even better. When I first tested this feature in Bard, it gave me an obviously wrong answer. But it provided two references. Which turned out to be AI generated web pages. Oddly enough in my own Googles I could not even find those pages in the results.

> Bard […] it provided two references. Which turned out to be AI generated web pages.

Welcome to the Habsburg Internet.

Re: Claude can now search the web

#643

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Zojirushi being difficult to clean is kind of a wild take, unless most of their other rice makers are a wild departure from mine.

Yeah, never had any trouble cleaning any of my Zojirushi equipment.

Perhaps there's some new rice cooker with AI cleaning /s

Until then, my Zojirushi is very simple to clean.

Re: Claude can now search the web

#644
post #503
post #431

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Right! So everyone would choose to pursue passions/interests/leisure. We would be going into debt with no meaningful benefit to the taxpayer. Direct malinvestment.

This is drawing a line between "us" (tax paying citizens + the government) and "them" (people on benefits). I don't think it's that simple. I imagine just like with existing benefits, the majority of people wouldn't feel great about being on UBI doing nothing, and they would pursue something that gives them a better social standing, a better sense of purpose, a good challenge, whatever motivates an individual. It's w…

Dude...I mean this in the nicest way possible and only say it cause I think it's important for everyone to understand:

People work for money. If a job has no pay, you can't expect it to get done.

We need people to actually run hospitals, produce food, construct shelter/infrastructure, provide childcare/education, etc.

Re: Claude can now search the web

#645

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Governments already provide "free income" in the form of free or subsidized services. Say you have a fire-department even though you personally might not be paying anything for it because you are so poor that you don't pay any taxes. You have police protecting you and the army. You have free primary school at least. So I think the question is, would it help for the government to provide more, or less, or the same amo…

If you have a government that runs a balanced budget, those services aren't free. > Would it "increase prices" if healthcare was free? That depends, who's ultimately footing the bill? If its paid for with taxes on businesses, yes most of that would be passed on to consumers in the form of price increases. If its paid for by consumer taxes, ultimately you will find consumers demanding higher wages and prices would aga…

> those services aren't free.

They are free for poor people. For instance, basic education must be free, so we can have a productive work-force that can read and write and pay taxes in the future, which will make us even richer.

Re: Claude can now search the web

#646

It badly hallucinated in my test. I asked it "Rust crate to access Postgres with Arrow support" and it made up an arrow-postgres crate. It even gave sample Rust code using this fictional crate! Below is its response (code example omitted): I can recommend a Rust crate for accessing PostgreSQL with Arrow support. The primary crate you'll want to use is arrow-postgres, which combines the PostgreSQL connectivity of the…

> I asked it "Rust crate to access Postgres with Arrow support" Is that how you actually use llms? Like a Google search box?

Exactly. An LLM is not a conventional search engine and shouldn't be prompted as if it were one. The difference between "Rust crate to access Postgres with Arrow support" and "What would a hypothetical Rust crate to access Postgres with Arrow support look like?" isn't that profound from the perspective of a language model. You'll get an answer, but it's entirely possible that you'll get the answer to a question that isn't the one you thought you were asking.

Some people aren't very good at using tools. You can usually identify them without much difficulty, because they're the ones blaming the tools.

Re: Claude can now search the web

#647
post #129

Earlier quoted context omitted.

For all paid users _in America_. It's not available for me in Europe.

I think 'For all paid users in the United States' is clearer. I live in America, but not in what the United States considers 'America', so I do not get to use this new feature yet.

Using America as a shorthand for "USA" is hardly limited to people who live in the US.

Re: Claude can now search the web

#648
post #102

Searching the web is a great feature in theory, but every implementation I've used so far looks at the top X hits and then interprets it to be the correct answer. When you're talking to an LLM about popular topics or common errors, the top results are often just blogspam or unresolved forum posts, so the you never get an answer to your problem. More of an indicator that web search is more unusable than ever, but inte…

"Searching" doesn't mean much without information about the ranking algorithm or the search provider, because with most searches there will be millions of results and it's important to know how the first results have been determined.

It's amazing that the post by Anthropic doesn't say anything about that. Do they maintain their own index and search infrastructure? (Probably not?) Or do they have a partnership with Bing or Google or some other player?

Re: Claude can now search the web

#649

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I asked it "Rust crate to access Postgres with Arrow support" Is that how you actually use llms? Like a Google search box?

“Prompting” is kind of a myth honestly. Think about it, how much marginal influence does it really have if you say OP’s version vs a fully formed sentence? The keywords are what gets it in the area.

That is not correct. The keywords mean nothing by themselves. To a transformer model, the relationships between words is where meaning resides. The model wants to answer your prompt with something that makes sense in context, so you have to help it out by providing that context. Feeding it a sentence fragment or a disjoint series of keywords may not have the desired effect.

To mix clichés, "I'm feeling lucky" isn't compatible with "Attention is all you need."

Re: Claude can now search the web

#650
post #489

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

[flagged]

My principle on giving the Hitler salute is to not do so publicly, or in the presence of elderly, Germans or jews you don’t know. Because whether you mean to be funny, try to provoke, or you’re a neo-nazi, it leaves room for ambiguity.

If I hadn’t a principle, I’d have to consider whether the social suicide of doing so is worth it. Musk could have thought of that, but he didn’t.

That still doesn’t make him a nazi. You need to actually believe that the genocide of Jews is worth pursuing. Or anything remotely resembling outright hatred of jews, and an idealisation of The Third Reich.

I also won’t post a dick pic, and this similarly does not discredit the argument I’m making:

Just because I won’t heil in public (I’m polite, and I have no points to make at 45 degrees), I won’t read Hitler into Musk’s arm waving, when he clearly does not follow up by justifying that he did, in fact, acknowledge the great work of Adolf Hitler. He didn’t because he doesn’t think Hitler was that great, because he’s not a nazi.

He’s not a nazi until he apologizes for not distancing himself from Hitler when he never said Hitler was great to begin with.

Otherwise: you’re a nazi until you publicly apologise for not leaving the subject matter unambiguous. And just saying you’re not is not enough, you have to apologise.

Post reply on HN