Live data from Hacker News

Tesla ending Models S and X production

cnbc.com

631–640 of 1001 posts

Re: Tesla ending Models S and X production

#632

[flagged]

Of course it's not about Tesla at all. Yeah, there's been overpromising and underdelivering on self-driving (is anyone doing better yet, though?), but in reality the hate is entirely about Elon and his politics.

How would I even know what Elon’s politics are? He’s too busy running the worlds biggest companies to get involved with politics.

Re: Tesla ending Models S and X production

#633
post #192

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Electric cars, maybe. Tesla is valued much larger than the rest of the auto industry combined though. Humanoid robots? Ain’t nobody made the business case for that. It is pure vibes.

Are you seriously saying there is no business case for humanoid robots?

Not for what they currently cost and are capable of.

Re: Tesla ending Models S and X production

#634
post #384
post #360

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That's all good, don't worry, the stock is doing quite well, near its record high. A man jumping around in spandex is all they need.

It's actually bizarre how seemingly nothing impacts $TSLA: profits down 46%, revenue down 3%, cutting successful product lines that used to sell quite a bit, a massively failed product in the Cybertruck, FSD promises still unfulfilled, and on top of all that US$ 2 billion siphoned away to another unrelated company. With all of that, the stock closed upwards on the after market hours. Perhaps only Musk's death could c…

Its not bizzare. Retail investors can no longer compete with big banks, who pretty much set the stock price. Elon solidified this with DOGE by removing oversight of such things.

At this point, investing is exacly like playing slots at casino.

Re: Tesla ending Models S and X production

#635

Why is it seen initially so negatively? There's nothing inherently wrong with a company deciding to stop producing models that are extremely old, have newer comparable models that are more widely available globally and sell multiples more of. So why would you keep those older models? If anything its a good thing. But its Tesla so nothing they do will be spoken positively of.

Because it's Elon Musk.

10 years ago people here would be describing this as a good decision.

Re: Tesla ending Models S and X production

#637
post #619

[flagged]

Lol yeah Tesla is doing so great they just got rid of two flagship models. Government rebates have ended. Sentiment towards EV has shifted negatively in consumer eyes. Manufacturers are sticking to gasoline. Even Jeep just got rid of all their electric stuff. Maybe they'll be good for self driving robot taxis over in California with "FSD." Past performance does not indicate future success.

Nop. The S and X were always meant low volume high priced. And it's a great strategy. Didn't Tesla repay loans before it was due?

Challenge is that even that good past performance was shat upon by people. I hate Elon. But I don't think Tesla is doing bad at all. GM is shitting itself on EVs.

Re: Tesla ending Models S and X production

#638

[flagged]

There is no evidence of unsupervised robotaxis actually rolling out. These are just the same promises Elon has wrongfully done since literally 10 years and some publicity stunts.

People have taken rides in unsupervised Teslas. Please check news.

Re: Tesla ending Models S and X production

#640

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> If you can train a policy that drives well on cameras, you can get self-driving. If you can't, you're fucked, and no amount of extra sensors will save you. Source: trust me, bro? This statement has no factual basis. Calling the most common approach of all other self-driving developers except Tesla a wank also is no argument but hate only.

[flagged]

This is so dumb, I don't even know if you are serious. Nobody ever said it is lidar instead of cameras, but as additional sensor to cameras. And everybody seems to agree that that is valuable sensor-information (except Tesla).
Post reply on HN