Earlier quoted context omitted.
OK, tell me which dumb people understand: - The differences between voting systems and why FPTP is one of the worst options possible. - That opinions are N-dimensional vectors and elections are describing your opinion by picking one point from a small predefined set. - How much money a day a person in the top 0.01% makes vs the top 50% and for how much time/effort. I am sure dumb people see problems and they probably…
> why FPTP is one of the worst options possible. There are certainly tradeoffs in everything, but majority rule is good enough. In practice any candidate that couldn't possibly handle the job has no real chance of winning. By the time you get into the race amongst those who have a realistic chance, they're all pretty much equally capable. Even if you don't get exactly who you want to see, the winner will be fine. It'…
- https://rangevoting.org/BayRegsFig.html
TL;DR
- It forces people to vote strategically according to who they believe has a chance to win instead of accurately describing their preferences.
- They can only express their opinion about one candidate, not all of them.
- The spoiler effect - more candidates for one side (on a given axis) increases the chance of a candidate on the other side winning.
I really encourage you to read all of those pages and play with the explorable explanations.
Dumb people are either able to understand this or generally have lower tendencies to engage in self-education so they don't know about these issues.
And, changing this fundamentally requires convincing dumb people because last time I checked there was not a single country where votes were weighted by intelligence.
> Since the dumb people end up being too dumb to participate
Again, this is incredibly wrong, everybody's vote counts the same.