Earlier quoted context omitted.
Malicious compliance is only illegal if it doesn't actually comply.
This is also wrong. Good faith is a requirement. Act in bad faith, and you can still be sanctioned. Do you have any background in this, or are you just asserting what you want reality to be? Because you are just spouting wrong information that, even for a non-lawyer, would take you 10 minutes to go find and read right information.
we're arguing semantics - "malicious compliance" is by definition compliant, meaning (in this case) it is in good faith.