Live data from Hacker News

I'm the Canadian who was detained by ICE for two weeks

theguardian.com

631–640 of 903 posts

Re: I'm the Canadian who was detained by ICE for two weeks

#631
post #147

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I am a dual-nation Canadian, with the other nationality held in much lower regard by the USA administration, meaning American conduct toward much of the world is not news to me. I believe a lot of resentment Canadians currently feel towards Americans boils down to being treated the way they treat any other undesirable country.

The resentment is also because there is a daily threat of annexion.

Ironically, that would certainly solve this woman's visa problems.

Re: I'm the Canadian who was detained by ICE for two weeks

#632

This is the money shot : "Companies like CoreCivic and GEO Group receive government funding based on the number of people they detain, which is why they lobby for stricter immigration policies. It’s a lucrative business: CoreCivic made over $560m from Ice contracts in a single year. In 2024, GEO Group made more than $763m from Ice contracts. The more detainees, the more money they make. It stands to reason that these…

Makes complete sense to me. That's how every other business works. Number of detainees is a mostly linear input (aside from the real estate) to opex.

Re: I'm the Canadian who was detained by ICE for two weeks

#633
post #595

Earlier quoted context omitted.

She tried to enter the country illegally and illegally apply for a work visa. 1) She co-founded a hemp drink company in California as a Canadian. "Jasmine Mooney, an actor who is also co-founder of the beverage brand Holy! Water, was detained on 3 March in San Diego, California." https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/mar/18/canadian-act... 2) She applied for a TN visa that was sponsored by her own company, which i…

Did you look up Section 214.6(b) [0] before you posted? Curious how you determined >> A professional will be deemed to be self-employed if he or she will be rendering services to a corporation or entity of which the professional is the sole or controlling shareholder or owner. Do you have a link to the ownership structure of Holy! Water? [0] https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CFR-2012-title8-vol1/pdf...

https://www.instagram.com/enjoyholywater/reel/C-3VLghyiHy/?l...

Re: I'm the Canadian who was detained by ICE for two weeks

#634

Her visa was revoked, and then she entered the US again. That's an immigration offense that can get you detained at the border (any international airport).

Correct me if I am wrong... she was actually in the US to apply for a new visa with a new company and not on business with the old company.

Re: I'm the Canadian who was detained by ICE for two weeks

#635
post #217

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I hate this new world and the rise of selfishness.

Which has now become a political programme ("(We won't do what is right, ) we will do what is in our interest").

> we will do what is in our interest

if that at least was true, but often it is not

Re: I'm the Canadian who was detained by ICE for two weeks

#636

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

[flagged]

To be blunt, your perspective does not align with reality.

The reality is that transgender Americans have been doing these things, all these things, for many decades. And nobody, and I do mean nobody, cared. Ultimately you are not inspecting penises in the Men's room. You, yourself, do not care.

What do you believe transgender people did in the 70s, or 80s, or 90s? You've never thought about it because you know, deep down, it's not a real issue. But, if you do think about it - or better yet, just ask them - you'd know they've already been doing these things.

Women do not run into burly men with beards when they go to the women's room. Do you know why? Because those transgender men have always gone to the men's room, and have never been questioned. Never been questioned, until conservatives decided to question it.

I have been alive for a long time now. We always knew trans people existed. Nobody batted an eye. Conservatives too, including conservatives that exist still, and including even you. Yes, that's correct - I am speaking for you, because I know you were not protesting these things in the 2010s, or the 2000s, or the 90s, or the 80s, or the 70s.

So no, you don't care, and no, you yourself believe these are not real issues. You might not say that now, because as I've already stated, the conservatives brought it into the zeitgeist to distract you. And now, you are distracted. Before, you were not.

And, to you and other conservatives, you should focus. The economy is in danger. Due process is being violated. Our constitution is in hot water.

The American right has been able to propagandize you, and others, so completely and so severely, that you not only do not pay attention to these issues, but you legitimately think you willingly chose to not pay attention. You didn't choose anything, this was carefully crafted for you. I challenge you to think back to an earlier time you were alive and question what you saw then.

Re: I'm the Canadian who was detained by ICE for two weeks

#637

Earlier quoted context omitted.

In the case of prison policy, keeping prisoners strictly separated by sex, with no transfers of male prisoners into women's prisons allowed, under any circumstances. Prisons should of course have safeguarding policy for further separation of vulnerable inmates within the prison. Interestingly this is exactly what male prisoners with a transgender identity were requesting, according to https://www.newyorker.com/magazi…

Do you think the status quo of American prisons is good for anyone? I agree that this issue could be handled better, but as a non-American I've been horrified by many more things in the American prison system than this.

Having a vulnerable inmates unit sounds like a great first step towards fixing some of the other abuses you might be thinking of.

Re: I'm the Canadian who was detained by ICE for two weeks

#638

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The only option is to pursue draconian “enforcement” on people who enter through ports of entry following the established legal process? Let’s not kid ourselves here, it’s not nor has it ever been about “illegal” immigration, it’s immigration in general.

What do you think the point is of having immigration laws? It’s to control how many immigrants come in and which ones. If you essentially make all the illegal immigration “legal” then you’ve erased the difference.

The conversation I engaged with was about people who are following the law. You are arguing against a point I never made here.

I’d ask you what the point of having laws is if we are going to detain and deport people outside of the established legal process.

This thread is in response to an individual who came here on a valid work visa.

Re: I'm the Canadian who was detained by ICE for two weeks

#639
post #416

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Possibly because the comment section will inevitably collapse into a partisan flamewar.

This is ironic. I thought there was a big push from the right for less censorship and less moderation in social media. Now we’re flagging posts because the comment section may get heated.

[flagged]

Re: I'm the Canadian who was detained by ICE for two weeks

#640
post #487

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Shouldn't be a partisan issue.

While I agree with you, it is observably true that many people take different positions on the issue and then demonize those who disagree with them, converting it into a partisan issue. Another commenter (now deleted) made the claim that, saying an issue shouldn't be partisan is “ just saying ‘everyone should believe what I do’ but in the lexicon of people who look down their nose at the general public. ” They added,…

> While I agree with you, it is observably true that many people take different positions on the issue and then demonize those who disagree with them, converting it into a partisan issue.

Sure, but you have to draw a line somewhere. Even on HN, there are opinions that you can't express (repeatedly) without being banned, even though there are clearly people with such opinions. Otherwise it's the Nazi bar problem - everyone who's not a Nazi will eventually leave.

Where exactly to draw the line is left as an exercise to the reader, but I suspect that some people just don't like where the line is currently being drawn.

Post reply on HN