Earlier quoted context omitted.
I love this page in your docs: https://ghostty.org/docs/about Clear, friendly, modest, respectful and with the right balance of detail vs overview. Congratulations on your launch.
I'm not sure why they couldn't put that on the front page. Or at least on the front page of the documentation. As it stands now, the front page is pretty useless if you never heard of ghostty. It's a ghost in a terminal? And there's tty in the name.... so is it a program to show ghosts in your terminal?
Ghostty 1.0
631–640 of 719 posts
Re: Ghostty 1.0
#632Earlier quoted context omitted.
Do you mean here? https://terminaltrove.com/categories/ (1) Or any other category on the page? (2) We can change (1) alphabetically if that is what you mean.
Yes, those categories. I should have been more explicit. I found it confusing to look for a category among the unsorted boxes. It would help if they were sorted.
Re: Ghostty 1.0
#633Re: Ghostty 1.0
#634The fact it does its own window decoration is a bit of a turn-off, but:
A quick test of speed against wezterm and gnome-terminal show ghostty (on my laptop) to be around 3 times faster than both of the other.
Will definitely try it for a couple of weeks.
Re: Ghostty 1.0
#635i use the base mac/Windows terminals and have never had any issues. what are the main things that draw people to alternatives?
Speed.
Re: Ghostty 1.0
#636Re: Ghostty 1.0
#637Earlier quoted context omitted.
That's a great approach. Not sure on the current state of Alacritty, but a few years back the suggested solution for users interested in battery performance was to switch to a different terminal emulator: https://github.com/alacritty/alacritty/issues/3473#issuecomm...
I, a person who don't care about battery performance one iota (because my computer has no battery), love this answer and approach. Not every software is for everyone, and authors drawing a line in the sand like that works out better for everyone in the long-term, instead of software that kind of works OK for everything.
I just find myself on the other side of the line for Alacritty.
Re: Ghostty 1.0
#638My takeaway is that it's mostly useful for apple stuff-- why would "platform native" matter on Linux?
I'm on Linux, and first impression is ghostty is really good. Speed in particular is impressive.
Re: Ghostty 1.0
#639I use Foot as my terminal and Niri as my WM. It’s a great combo. Niri handles splits for me, and I don’t need tabs. I also turn off all window decorations, so my terminal content gets 100% of the terminal’s screen real estate-- so I don't need a native UI. All that said, it looks like Ghosty can be configured to match this setup, so I’ll give it a try. I just wanted to mention Foot to anyone who is running Linux. Foo…
Is it weird that I never considered foot because of the name? At least when you say "alacritty" i understand that it's a terminal. When I tell someone I use "foot"... I don't know, it doesn't give a good feeling.
Re: Ghostty 1.0
#640The only thing I’m eagerly waiting for now is the implementation of search [1], but otherwise, it’s absolutely stellar.!
I set Ghostty as my default terminal emulator now.