Earlier quoted context omitted.
The biggest issue to user's privacy has traditionally been data breaches. Peoples lives and most intimate details is going to be stored as bits. Get used to it. Whether for targeting purpose (Facebook) or personal reasons (Strava). Whether stored on remote servers or home. It wont affect likeliness of data breaches. Focus on good software designs and let programmers design such systems in peace. All this needed was f…
GDPR is designed to not simply accept that "Peoples lives and most intimate details is going to be stored as bits. Get used to it." but instead try to change that. Changing that is nontrivial, since it requires changing the behavior of everyone handling this data - so, something that can be done only by law. It will restrict Facebook, it will restrict Strava, it will restrict data stored on remote servers and home. W…
So if the rationale for GDPR to reduce data breaches or to deny private data to future rouge govt, then it fails. Private data will still exist even if its not commercialzed. Its irrelevent who control it (user or company) as long as its connected to internet, there is risk of data breaches.
Unless you propose to go back to storing actual photos in actual albums. ITT im not sure.