Earlier quoted context omitted.
In no particular order - Meetings - Reading papers - Understanding legacy code - Reading internal news - Ad hoc chats with coworkers - Writing docs - Editing configs - Thinking about solutions - Slacking off - Analyzing results - Testing code - Reviewing PRs - Understanding others' ongoing projects
AI can do everything you listed except chats with coworkers and slacking off. I just don't think you've utilized the most recent versions of codex or claude.
Software engineering may no longer be a lifetime career
621–630 of 809 posts
Re: Software engineering may no longer be a lifetime career
#622I keep reading about how AI will be fine because people can just retrain for different careers. However, I never read what those careers are or who is going to pay for retraining. I certainly don't have the money or time to go back to college and start a new career at the bottom.
The argument is that “that’s what always happened in the past”. Which is true, but it’s true as long as it’s not true. The classic example of how drastically this kind of thinking can fail is Malthusian theory, that populations would collapse because food growth was linear while population growth was exponential. This was true for all of history until Malthus actually made this observation. At a mechanistic level, th…
Re: Software engineering may no longer be a lifetime career
#623Earlier quoted context omitted.
> The AI is coming for that too. That may be true I’m not gonna say one way or the other, but if AI comes for that then almost all knowledge work is effectively dead, so all that’s left would be sales or physical labor.
The history of the last 250 years is inventing new professions as old ones are automated away. I expect that to continue.
My parents say a lot of stuff like this. They tend to gloss over the untold suffering, great depressions and world wars that took us to get here.
The planets resources were also not in risk of running out. As the world is min maxed by billionaires, it nice the lower classes are drained of all capital, they will soon move to fighting each other for resources. the future is looking pretty grim for even the most optimistic of scenarios
Re: Software engineering may no longer be a lifetime career
#624Earlier quoted context omitted.
That's a lot of SV-speak. How exactly do people step into an entrepreneurial phase? They're at work in corporate settings with fixed defined roles. Most workplaces are not many-hatted-donning startup environments, but restricted roles where there are deliverables, deadlines, meetings, etc. Which leaves out of hours for "entrepreneurship" whatever that is. Github project work on the weekends? That's not possible for m…
>That's a lot of SV-speak. How exactly do people step into an entrepreneurial phase? Almost half of U.S. employment is from small businesses (250 or less employees). That's means there's a lot of entrepreneurship happening already. I have lots of family running their own small businesses (trades), and it's a lot of work, and doesn't necessarily pay as well as a cushy corporate job, but what I'm trying to say is lots…
Here's another problem - how do you get healthcare without a corporate group plan? In my state the ACA offers expensive in-network only plans where you wait months for appointments.
Re: Software engineering may no longer be a lifetime career
#625In my experience, it's been the complete opposite. The very experienced engineers that are actually willing to use top of the line tooling are much better than they were before, including those that are over 40, and over 50. Part of the practical degradation of traditional programmers over time has always been concentration and deep calculation, just like in chess. The old chess player knows chess much better than a…
you just confirmed the point that the author is making in the article:
the team of 6 is no longer needed,
and, logically, is therefore eliminated by the company
So yes, SWE still exists as a career for some, but their numbers might be reduced by 85%.
Re: Software engineering may no longer be a lifetime career
#626Earlier quoted context omitted.
That's a lot of SV-speak. How exactly do people step into an entrepreneurial phase? They're at work in corporate settings with fixed defined roles. Most workplaces are not many-hatted-donning startup environments, but restricted roles where there are deliverables, deadlines, meetings, etc. Which leaves out of hours for "entrepreneurship" whatever that is. Github project work on the weekends? That's not possible for m…
> That's a lot of SV-speak. How exactly do people step into an entrepreneurial phase? Oh, you simply decide to use grit and willpower to pull yourself up by your bootstraps, placing some calls to people you met at certain parties aided by a small 6 digit loan from your family. /s My default expectation of "employees should be more entrepreneurial" is that's it's a kind of victim-blaming. I'm especially cynical if the…
Re: Software engineering may no longer be a lifetime career
#627Multiple times per week I have the same conversation. It goes something like this: - AI will make developers irrelevant - Why? - Because LLMs can write code - Do you know what I do for a living? - Yes, write code? - Yes, about 2-5% of the time. Less now. - But you said you are a developer? - I did - So what do you do 95-98% of the time? - I understand things and then apply my ability to formulate solutions - But I ca…
Wonderful articulation. There's a plethora of prognostication about how AI will change everything in software and beyond and the thing I keep thinking is, well, when will the talk stop and the demonstration of results commence. It doesn't seem to have as yet.
If it works, it'll work. The methods will spread and quickly be accessible to everyone, and progress will go on. That's great.
If it doesn't work, we'll also see that in the absence of real results. And simply stating you are seeing it doesn't qualify. It must be something we can all see and use that is unavoidably, undeniably real.
Re: Software engineering may no longer be a lifetime career
#628Earlier quoted context omitted.
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, not the opposite. There’s no current evidence to suggest limitless progress, or even superlinear progress with regards to compute and energy. My guess would be sub linear or even logarithmic progress vs. linear growth in compute and energy, as that’s how most physical systems behave.
No one said unlimited progress. Let's not revert to straw man claims. If you think the potential of LLMs is overblown feel free to short the market. I don't pretend to know the future. But if I may, I don't think you are framing the debate in the correct terms. Evidence is an important facet of human affairs. So is risk. Best of luck with your predictions.
“Unlimited progress” is not a statement on the rate of progress, it’s a statement on the limits of progress. It’s a much weaker claim than you’re framing it as. Your claim very much is that we have not yet reached the limits of LLMs potential. My claim, conversely, is that we’re already reaching diminishing returns, which are being masked by a massive influx of compute and energy. My short: LLMs are not the path to AGI.
Re: Software engineering may no longer be a lifetime career
#629Earlier quoted context omitted.
Like doordashing and pokemon card reselling.
Don't forget OnlyFans and streaming.
Re: Software engineering may no longer be a lifetime career
#630So yes, software engineering may no longer be a lifetime career for a lot of people, much like elite sport is not a viable career for most—but still, some will, and must, make it their career.