Live data from Hacker News

Zig quits GitHub, says Microsoft's AI obsession has ruined the service

theregister.com

621–630 of 641 posts

Re: Zig quits GitHub, says Microsoft's AI obsession has ruined the service

#621

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Zig is the language that was intentionally made to fail and error out on windows carriage returns instead of parsing them like every language ever made. They made a version for windows and then made it not work with every windows text editor. Their answer was to 'get better text editors' or 'make a preprocessing program to strip out carriage returns' or 'don't use windows' (they had a windows executable). This is not…

Use a real operating system and problem solved?

Is this directed at Zig? They're the ones that released a windows executable.

Re: Zig quits GitHub, says Microsoft's AI obsession has ruined the service

#622
I feel the biggest advantage about GitHub over other platforms is that many tools that integrate with a software project platform are GitHub first, others later.

Tooling support can be miserable when you had something in BitBucket, GitLab, and non-existent if isn't those top 3.

Re: Zig quits GitHub, says Microsoft's AI obsession has ruined the service

#623

The edit history of the announcement is quite a ride: > [2025-11-27T02:10:07Z] it’s abundantly clear that the talented folks who used to work on the product have moved on to bigger and better things, with the remaining losers eager to inflict some kind of bloated, buggy JavaScript framework on us in the name of progress [1] > [2025-11-27T14:04:47Z] it’s abundantly clear that the talented folks who used to work on the…

You missed the monkeys. That was my highlight. My team was called "code monkeys" once.

Re: Zig quits GitHub, says Microsoft's AI obsession has ruined the service

#624
post #419

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Its a thing with (online) culture - no matter what you do you're going to ruffle some feathers. If no one hates what you are doing chances are you're not doing anything really

Well, it was comparing people with monkeys and calling them losers. It was a straightforward personal insult. Writing something online in a blog is like making a public announcement on a market with 100s listening. No one except someone who wants to inflame would use such words in the real world. People just forget that they are speaking in the public. And in that case not only for himself but also for others.

I was more referring to the practice of "self-censoring" and editing what one wrote after publishing.

Of course you are right and it was distasteful but I'm sure they genuinely felt that way when they first wrote it.

Re: Zig quits GitHub, says Microsoft's AI obsession has ruined the service

#625

Earlier quoted context omitted.

From where I'm sitting it seems like it's time for you to take a break from this thread.

I guess we're at the "claim the other person is upset to avoid what they said" (and edit posts) part of the conversation.

No, we're at the you're making an emotional argument backed by hyperbole and I'm moving on stage. Look at your language: punished, trolled, "any piece of software", "every piece of software", "it takes longer to write an error message than it does it just split a line correctly", "lawyer grasping at straws".

You're personally aggrieved because someone dared release a compiler that runs on windows but doesn't accept non-standard line endings. I've already addressed what you've said but you've responded with a bunch of handwaving because you're merely making an emotional argument.

If you'd like me at address what you wrote again:

  it takes longer to write an error message than it does it just split a line correctly
It takes longer to write your tantrums than to configure your development environment correctly.

Re: Zig quits GitHub, says Microsoft's AI obsession has ruined the service

#626

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I guess we're at the "claim the other person is upset to avoid what they said" (and edit posts) part of the conversation.

No, we're at the you're making an emotional argument backed by hyperbole and I'm moving on stage. Look at your language: punished, trolled, "any piece of software", "every piece of software", "it takes longer to write an error message than it does it just split a line correctly", "lawyer grasping at straws". You're personally aggrieved because someone dared release a compiler that runs on windows but doesn't accept n…

You're personally aggrieved

Nope

doesn't accept non-standard line endings

It is standard on windows.

I've already addressed what you've said

No you haven't. You haven't addressed anything I've said, like legitimate reasons for doing it or what you would think if other languages did the same thing on other OSs.

you're merely making an emotional argument.

Seems like projection. I wrote things that actually happened.

It takes longer to write your tantrums

I know it would be convenient to frame things this way but if you could confront what I'm saying you would have done it with all the chances you had.

Why won't you respond to what I'm saying? I think it's because there is no real defense and you know that.

Re: Zig quits GitHub, says Microsoft's AI obsession has ruined the service

#627
post #398
post #305

"Either you have to embrace the AI, or you get out of your career," Dohmke. Dohmke left CEO position of GitHub in November.

Who's the CEO now?

No one, they haven't filled this position and don't plan to.

Re: Zig quits GitHub, says Microsoft's AI obsession has ruined the service

#629
post #595

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

I am almost certain that the zig project will somehow manage to survive anyway without you following them. And now you know about an alternative to gh that isn't a for profit company! Yay!

> I am almost certain that the zig project will somehow manage to survive anyway without you following them.

It took longer than expected for this comment to show up.

Re: Zig quits GitHub, says Microsoft's AI obsession has ruined the service

#630
post #592
post #484

Earlier quoted context omitted.

3 of the most exciting decentralized GitHub alternatives being developed today: Tangled (2024, ATP) Radicle (2019, IPFS) Codeberg (2018, Gitea fork which supports decentralized protocols)

Which decentralized protocols does Codeberg support?

Codeberg doesnt currently support any, but Forgejo, the software it runs on, is implementing support for ActivityPub. Codeberg will likely enable it once support is stable.
Post reply on HN