Earlier quoted context omitted.
Is not just a question of preferences, there are risks also. If the problem is that we need lots of energy to create pressure to separate salt from brine, well... I figure out that there is a lot of free "all that you can eat" pressure in the sea bottom. The problem would be to calculate if moving all this weight up and down the sea (and in open sea) would be economical or not. Or of would unavoidably lead to people…
Having all of this in mind, I would go further and propose to regulate by law changing the material of the deep sea submarine ballasts. It seems technically doable and would have some benefits 1) Lesser impact on deep sea ecosystems. No human trace left behind. Disposable loads of iron or concrete will remain forever in the bottom. If we use salt or sand instead the impact on fragile deep sea ecosystems seems reduced…
Which country's law? There are many of them.
> 1) Lesser impact on deep sea ecosystems. No human trace left behind.
There's barely any submarines around. This is a drop in the bucket.
> 2) Improved economics?
If it improves economics, why do you need to force people with regulation?