Live data from Hacker News

Start Self Hosting

rohanrd.xyz

621–625 of 625 posts

Re: Start Self Hosting

#621
post #132

This is why I'm building Timelinize [1]. It's a follow-up to my open source Timeliner project [2], which has the potential to download all your digital life onto your own computer locally, and projects it all onto a single timeline, across all data sources (text messages, social media sites, photos, location history, and more). It's a little different from "self hosting" but it does have a similar effect of bringing…

Love the project. Got an emaillist? I'm not a frequent hackernews users

Re: Start Self Hosting

#622
post #254

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Laypeople don't know that systemd exists. They will install a webserver or something and the package manager will automatically install and enable its unit file.

What “lay person” is going to install a web server??? That’s insane. Maybe a lay faang-er would. Lay people work in a factory or shoe store or accounting firm. They have 1 or more kids. They hear what their friends are doing, and as long as it only requires signing up on a web page, they will consider it. They will use the same password as they do for their bank. And that’s FINE! There is life outside technology, and…

There's plenty of simple webservers around. I used to use one at school that was a single (likely self-extracting zip) exe file that ran Apache on the given port; the document root was configurable, but defaulted to the relative path ./public_html. I would be surprised if there isn't a project somewhere that's effectively a QT gui to start a Python webserver like this[1], as a single self-contained exe file.

[1]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/44586441/ddg#44586701

Re: Start Self Hosting

#623

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I'm currently working on realiable solutions (physical wireless and application layers) to extend the local-first system to be automatically secured even you have intermittent Internet outage unlike TailScale and ZeroTier Sorry but i don't understand what this means. Internet outage should not affect your LAN services, no matter what selfhosting distro you use.

For silo self hosting, Internet outage should not affect your services, but for most of local-first services it's critical to maintain your systems security with necessary credentials. For an example consider a rental car that you take for camping in the countryside. Internet outage that makes your rental car useless is unacceptable.

I think i'm even more confused. Why would my rental car need network access at all? (it's already a shame and a great source of cost/problems that it has any electronics)

Also, what prevents my TLS/SSH/whatever certs from working in an offline setup? i do that all the time without downsides, so i'm probably missing your point. if you have a page explaining your project and usecase feel free to link

Re: Start Self Hosting

#624
post #424

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You should probably use headscale instead of you care about self hosting. If you don't trust Google drive with your passwords, why would you trust a company's server that manages access to all of your devices?

Never heard of headscale before. Doesn't it require the control server to be accessible publicly?

Yes, that's the trade off. Let someone else manage the control server, or manage it yourself - not self hosted vs self hosted

Re: Start Self Hosting

#625
post #456
post #423

Earlier quoted context omitted.

*headscale If you care about privacy or self hosting, use headscale instead. You have no idea what tailscale is really doing.

>You have no idea what tailscale is really doing. please elaborate...

What I mean is just the general statement that can be applied to any company or server. Even if they release all of their code as free and open source (not entirely true, as I understand it - their public servers that handle connecting your devices is not), there is no gaurantee that they are actually using that specific, unmodified code on their servers. They could add or remove whatever they like to the software before deploying it on their servers without you knowing. You have to trust whatever they may write on their blogs. Some people may not care, but the winds these days are shifting away from trusting companies with their private data.
Post reply on HN