This is why I'm building Timelinize [1]. It's a follow-up to my open source Timeliner project [2], which has the potential to download all your digital life onto your own computer locally, and projects it all onto a single timeline, across all data sources (text messages, social media sites, photos, location history, and more). It's a little different from "self hosting" but it does have a similar effect of bringing…
Start Self Hosting
621–625 of 625 posts
Re: Start Self Hosting
#622Earlier quoted context omitted.
Laypeople don't know that systemd exists. They will install a webserver or something and the package manager will automatically install and enable its unit file.
What “lay person” is going to install a web server??? That’s insane. Maybe a lay faang-er would. Lay people work in a factory or shoe store or accounting firm. They have 1 or more kids. They hear what their friends are doing, and as long as it only requires signing up on a web page, they will consider it. They will use the same password as they do for their bank. And that’s FINE! There is life outside technology, and…
[1]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/44586441/ddg#44586701
Re: Start Self Hosting
#623Earlier quoted context omitted.
> I'm currently working on realiable solutions (physical wireless and application layers) to extend the local-first system to be automatically secured even you have intermittent Internet outage unlike TailScale and ZeroTier Sorry but i don't understand what this means. Internet outage should not affect your LAN services, no matter what selfhosting distro you use.
For silo self hosting, Internet outage should not affect your services, but for most of local-first services it's critical to maintain your systems security with necessary credentials. For an example consider a rental car that you take for camping in the countryside. Internet outage that makes your rental car useless is unacceptable.
Also, what prevents my TLS/SSH/whatever certs from working in an offline setup? i do that all the time without downsides, so i'm probably missing your point. if you have a page explaining your project and usecase feel free to link
Re: Start Self Hosting
#624Earlier quoted context omitted.
You should probably use headscale instead of you care about self hosting. If you don't trust Google drive with your passwords, why would you trust a company's server that manages access to all of your devices?
Never heard of headscale before. Doesn't it require the control server to be accessible publicly?
Re: Start Self Hosting
#625Earlier quoted context omitted.
*headscale If you care about privacy or self hosting, use headscale instead. You have no idea what tailscale is really doing.
>You have no idea what tailscale is really doing. please elaborate...