Earlier quoted context omitted.
> You do reduce the workforce through attrition, but eventually you have to hire again and hire almost exclusively junior people ( This wouldn't be true if government pay was competitive (low pay partially offset by, particularly, pension benefits means entering government mid-career except as a box-checking thing to move to a private position leveraging the knowledge of government is discouraged, but entering at a j…
That's one of the things that would help. Particularly for scientists and engineers. The salaries are way below what they could achieve in the private sector (often doing the same or similar work with contractors, in the defense industry).
Donald Trump’s Contract with the American Voter [pdf]
621–630 of 1001 posts
Re: Donald Trump’s Contract with the American Voter [pdf]
#622"All vetting of people coming into our country will be considered “extreme vetting.” " I visit the US every year to see friends. Some of whom are Arab-American. I'm seriously worried that I'm going to find myself on the receiving end of 'extreme vetting'.
Free colonoscopy though.
Re: Donald Trump’s Contract with the American Voter [pdf]
#623Earlier quoted context omitted.
> If you really think about it. We only need this wall because of Mexico, so why should we pay if we dont have to? People flee Mexico because it's an extremely poor country with a horrible government and is controlled by drug cartels. Screwing the country over further economically sounds like the worst way to solve this problem. In fact, it seems like a very good way to exacerbate the problem. Perhaps that's why priv…
> Screwing the country over further economically sounds like the worst way to solve this problem. First, I am just a random uneducated and ignorant American, so take my two cents for what it is...only two cents. From my vantage point, cutting off the drug cartels access to the US market could potentially do wonders to shifting the balance of power and helping Mexico in the long run. Also, as unpopular as it is, the U…
On second thought, you might be on to something here.
Re: Donald Trump’s Contract with the American Voter [pdf]
#624Earlier quoted context omitted.
It will end up being made in the US though.
Not US, Vietnam. Foxconn has manufacturing plant in Vietnam. Vietnam is cheaper than China.
Re: Donald Trump’s Contract with the American Voter [pdf]
#625Earlier quoted context omitted.
Despite being an independent left leaning liberal, I welcome this proposal, if they can actually implement it. I see wide-spread exploitation of the "Sanctuary City" Law in San Francisco, especially in the Restaurants, Construction site and Janitorial jobs. The Sanctuary Law, for those that don't know, forbids the Feds from asking employers about the immigration status of the employees / workers. This has caused 100s…
And you find that cutting federal funding entirely is a reasonable, proportional response?
Re: Donald Trump’s Contract with the American Voter [pdf]
#626Earlier quoted context omitted.
If it works out to impeding trade with China in anyway it just acts to slow our economy. We are not going to become more competitive with 1+ billion people who are willing to work without any labor protections by saying we won't do business with them. We're just sanctioning ourselves from essentially the world's manufacturing depot.
It could result in jobs for locals - however then investment needs to be made to support the manufacturing, educating skilled workers, etc.
Re: Donald Trump’s Contract with the American Voter [pdf]
#627Earlier quoted context omitted.
Fossil fuels aren't going to get that surcharge under the Republicans. You have to play the hand you're dealt, or whine about it, telling everyone how ignorant they are. In another decade, when the Democrats take Presidency or the Senate, maybe you'll get some offsetting charges. Of course, we'll have lost a decade and the problem will be much worse, if no forward progress is made. Solar hasn't gotten cheap enough th…
Ironic that you are complaining about me whining but in fact you are the one putting your hands up and saying "nothing we can do about the government, best to just leave it to the market". I am more optimistic that change is possible. There are still numerous opportunities for people to convince Republicans to start believing in climate change and making the energy market fair and equitable to allow renewable technol…
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/solar-stocks-tank-and-lead-...
Furthermore, we need cheap clean energy everywhere in the world. Fossil fuels are not going away fast enough.
Re: Donald Trump’s Contract with the American Voter [pdf]
#628Just so everyone is aware: selling insurance across state lines is code for "gut all insurance regulations". Why did most credit card banks relocate their paper headquarters to SD? Because SD had no usury laws and federal law said laws of your headquarters was all that mattered. It gutted all state regulation of credit cards in one fell swoop. This is the same approach DJT and the Republicans want to take for health…
Re: Donald Trump’s Contract with the American Voter [pdf]
#629Earlier quoted context omitted.
The appeal is that it would make being a career politician impossible and that term-limited congress would therefore act out of interest for their constituents rather than themselves. But you're right that it would also prevent good politicians from staying. Another proposal which could have a similar effect would be to drastically increase the number of representatives so that each one represents a smaller number of…
The appeal is that it would make being a career politician impossible The assumption, and I'm not saying that it's necessarily wrong, is that "career politician" is undesirable. How about getting rid of "career software developers"? Get rid of those entrenched JavaScript devs that are only interested in feathering their own nests. "Career doctors"? The medical profession is really just a business, and it should be tr…
Re: Donald Trump’s Contract with the American Voter [pdf]
#630Earlier quoted context omitted.
There's a lot of room to wonder about his trustworthiness given his record as a businessman, but even in this document, he doesn't address campaign finance reform. Congressional term-limits just consolidate power in the moneyed elites--the problems is not just the politicians, it's who corrupted them. If anything, this is a document to passify those moneyed interests who, unlike say Sheldon Adelson, worry about a Tru…
Is campaign finance reform really that big an issue, considering Trump just proved it's possible to win an election without any big money or support from special interests?