Failing grades soar with AI usage, dwindling math skills in Berkeley CS classes

Post by Archer6621 » Thu, Jun 04, 2026, 6:31 PM UTC

cloche wrote: post #502

eueje wrote: post #268

Earlier quoted context omitted.

“ However, when looking at muscle, once you have it you don't need to use it as much in order to maintain it” No.. this depends on how much muscle you have. The appropriate comparison is mass and density of knowledge/understanding vs muscle. There’s not a chance in hell you will retain mass and dense muscle without pushing the body hard. Just in the same way you will not retain very deep understanding of things unles…

To maintain the muscle you have, you only need about 1/3rd of your normal workouts. It can be retained with 1-2 workouts per week. I imagine the same would be for something you've learned. If you've already put in the effort to learn it, reviewing it ~1x per week is probably enough. During the accumulation phase though - whether it be muscle or learning a new skill - once a week is definitely not enough.

Post by thewebguyd » Thu, Jun 04, 2026, 6:33 PM UTC

mrngld wrote: post #312

windward wrote: post #299

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>(perhaps guide them how they can use them professionally) If that's anything like how they guided me to use programming languages professionally... In my workplace I find systems and policies move too slowly to keep up with how rapidly the LLM world is changing. Colleges are even more glacial. They've barely adapted to video conferencing.

Yes, meanwhile, Claude Cowork was only released this past January. And that was amazing. But I don't know about anyone else but I've already moved on to just using Codex for just about everything (except some Kagi use). Schools work on timescales of years, AI is advancing on the timescale of weeks and months. Until that situation stabilizes I think the only institution capable of teaching about it is the family -- pa…

Post by keeda » Thu, Jun 04, 2026, 6:40 PM UTC

Theodores wrote: post #567

keeda wrote: post #545

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Many of them can no longer sit quietly for even 30 minutes just thinking on their own Plummeting attention spans has been a trend for much, much longer than LLMs and is more the result of constant digital interruptions and these days overwhelmingly social media and doomscrolling: https://www.apa.org/news/podcasts/speaking-of-psychology/att... The effects on children have gotten most of the, err, attention, but the…

In 2002 I spoke with a lecturer in the humanities and he told me about how nobody was learning French at university level (in the UK). My own course had been cancelled due to the cost of teaching it, and the era of 'easy degrees' had set in during the early 90s. Before that, I also noticed the decline in newspaper readership in the 80s. It is easy to blame this general decline on the latest tech (or moral panic), whe…

Post by wil421 » Thu, Jun 04, 2026, 6:42 PM UTC

conductr wrote: post #140

camelmel wrote: post #35

I have some sympathy for these kids. If LLMs were around when I was a student, I would've also used them to "speed up" my homework assignments then proceed to fail all my tests. Now I work mostly with PhDs who were at the top of every academic environment they've ever been in. And yet I can see their thinking skills rapidly declining as well; many of them can no longer brainstorm, code, think deeply, or write without…

I’m not noticing the decline in my own abilities any more than I had before using them. I finished undergrad 20 years ago and my once sharp math skills had been severely diminished within only 5-10 years. Just simple arithmetic and percentages that I could rapidly do in my head became dependent on calculators/spreadsheets. For all other trivia type knowledge, my brain has offloaded it to the internet RAM in my pocket…

Post by jawilson2 » Thu, Jun 04, 2026, 6:44 PM UTC

WorldMaker wrote: post #613

jawilson2 wrote: post #599

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I've told people this for years. The mode of communication reflects the urgency. If you text me, expect a response on the order of 3+ days. If you call, and I recognize the number, it will be more urgent. If I DON'T recognize it, it goes to voicemail and back in the 3+ days queue. If you show up at my door, it is immediate. Even with my wife, she will text while I'm at the grocery to pick up some extra food items, an…

The current trend seems to be switching the priority order of calls and texts among many of us. I feel like a call should be scheduled, preferably 3+ days out, and preferably with an agenda attached. (Same rules I feel about any sort of meeting.) But a direct text (non-group chat, just to me) is a priority. Group chats get that 1-2 days middle ground.