611–620 of 1001 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
At my kids school the children have been using grok to create pics of other children without clothes on - chatgpt etc won’t let you do that - grok needs some controls and x seem unable to do that themselves.
What would raiding the office achieve in this case apart from just showing off power.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
In your hypothetical scenario, why aren't the school kids making and distributing fake nudes of his daughter be the ones getting in trouble? Have we a outsourced all accountability for the crimes of humans to AI now?
The crime is creating a system that lets schoolboys create fake nudes of other minors.
You don't just get to build a CSAM-generator and then be like "well I never intended for it to be used...".
The humans running a company are liable for the product that their company builds, easy as that.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Frankly it sounds to me like a "show me the man and I'll show you the crime" kind of operation. France and the UK, and judging by yesterday's speech by the PM of Spain maybe the whole EU might be looking to do what China and Russia did earlier on and start cracking down on foreign social media by making it impossible to operate without total alignment with their vision and not just their (new) rules. Together with a…
It's worth pointing out that in France and the UK, the authorities involved are arms length independent of the political bodies - it's not like the US where if you give the President good vibes you can become head of the FBI, and all you have to do in return is whatever he says. There are statutory instruments (in France, constitutional clauses), that determine the independence of these authorities. They are tasked -…
The European Court of Human Rights has reminded this point (e.g. 29 Mar 2010, appl. no. 3394/03), and the Court of Justice of the European Union reaches a very similar conclusion (2 Mar 2021, C-746/18): prosecutors are part of the executive hierarchy and can’t be treated as the neutral, independent judicial check some procedures require.
For a local observer, this is made obvious by the fact that the procureur, in France, always follows current political vibes, usually in just a few months delay (extremely fast, when you consider how slowly justice works in the country).
[flagged]
[flagged]
Earlier quoted context omitted.
In your hypothetical scenario, why aren't the school kids making and distributing fake nudes of his daughter be the ones getting in trouble? Have we a outsourced all accountability for the crimes of humans to AI now?
This is accountability for the crimes of humans. The crime is creating a system that lets schoolboys create fake nudes of other minors. You don't just get to build a CSAM-generator and then be like "well I never intended for it to be used...". The humans running a company are liable for the product that their company builds, easy as that.
So like Photoshop? Do you want to raid Adobe's HQ?
This vindicates the pro-AI censorship crowd I guess. It definitely makes it clear what is expected of AI companies. Your users aren't responsible for what they use your model for, you are, so you'd better make sure your model can't ever be used for anything nefarious. If you can't do that without keeping the model closed and verifying everyone's identities... well, that's good for your profits I guess.
[flagged]
[flagged]
You should want to protect all of the people in your life from such a thing or nobody.