Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
[flagged]
[flagged]
Meta censors pro-Palestinian views on a global scale, report claims
611–620 of 903 posts
Re: Meta censors pro-Palestinian views on a global scale, report claims
#612Earlier quoted context omitted.
> ok so a large human rights group calling it apartheid isn't enough https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CoFjbnvkmQ0&ab_channel=Amnes ... Although this is a common perception, just the fact a human rights group declares something doesn't make it so. I have to remind you that you live in a world where the UN Human Rights council chair is a country where they publicly hang gay people on cranes and rapes women in prisons. C…
> Although this is a common perception, just the fact a human rights group declares something doesn't make it so. ok so I guess amnesty international isn't a good source on if something is an apartheid by your logic? > Case in point, Lebanon is a country where you cannot become president by law if you're not born from a specific Christian sect. This is a country where ethnic discrimination is codified into laws (and…
Generally I'll disengage as we're going in circles. But I'll say this, if you want to claim Israel is an 'apartheid state' or that a 'systematic extermination' is going on, you can't treat these as truisms and expect everyone to follow along.
You need to assert your claims and be ready to defend them, "Amnesty said so" is not enough to define a government system, and I heard it somewhere in youtube is not enough to declare genocide.
The conflict is extremely complex and nuanced just as the rest of the world is. People sometimes use this conflict as a way to flatly project their Good vs Evil binary attitudes, please try to embrace complexity.
Re: Meta censors pro-Palestinian views on a global scale, report claims
#613Re: Meta censors pro-Palestinian views on a global scale, report claims
#614Re: Meta censors pro-Palestinian views on a global scale, report claims
#615Hashtags like #GazaStarving got banned on Instagram for no reason. Yea there is bad censorship.
are the pictures of the hostages being removed for no reason?
Re: Meta censors pro-Palestinian views on a global scale, report claims
#616Re: Meta censors pro-Palestinian views on a global scale, report claims
#617Can someone explain how every single post about Palestine/Israel is flagged and removed the instant it hits front page? I have seen this with around 4-5 threads personally and who knows how many I missed
Possibly due to the topic attracting emotional, inflammatory responses rather than an objective, on-topic discussion.
Some people can't resist and have to turn every thread into a battlefield as if this achieves something on the ground. (Often citing the exact same disinformation that has been propagating across social media.)
Re: Meta censors pro-Palestinian views on a global scale, report claims
#618Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's often accompanied by cheerful comments whenever an israeli soldier dies in gaza, killed by hamas. I think it's pretty clear those people are on the terrorists side on this war.
Like most arguments in controversial topics, there are good versions of the argument and bad ones. It behooves everyone not to use the bad arguments to outright dismiss the good ones.
I agree with your point, however in this case i think it's important to pinpoint the hypocrisy of some people.
You can't blame israel for oct 7, ask them to stop their ongoing operations in gaza, not call for the release of hostages, not say a word about the women raped by hamas and gaza civilians, AND pretend to "just want to spare the civilians population". Those people are in practice siding for the hamas, even if they deny it.
Re: Meta censors pro-Palestinian views on a global scale, report claims
#619Earlier quoted context omitted.
Unfortunately, wishing for the ceasing-of-existence of an apartheid state is considered justified by most of the world.
> Unfortunately, wishing for the ceasing-of-existence of an apartheid state is considered justified by most of the world. Any reason other than hyperbole that you consider Israel to be an apartheid state, as compared to the rest of the Arab countries?
It's absolutely pointless for us to discuss once again why Israel is considered to be practicing apartheid. It has been established by the major human rights organisations: among which Amnesty International, Human Right Watch, and in Israel, B'Tselem. That's all we need to know, if you don't agree contest those and their findings- which you can consult online.
Re: Meta censors pro-Palestinian views on a global scale, report claims
#620Earlier quoted context omitted.
> would probably take generations for sentiment to change It will likely take forever unless steps are taken to initiate a peace process.
Honestly I'm not sure how we can start a peace process after the terrorist atrocities that were committed? At this point I think the best is to just evacuate all Palestinians to the rest of the Arab countries as refugees and then just leave the contested territory as unoccupied and "dmz" like for both sides. And honestly where tf is the UN in all of this?
[flagged]