Live data from Hacker News

Apple Mac Studio

apple.com

611–620 of 734 posts

Re: Apple Mac Studio

#611

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How long did it take you to check the 'Optimize Storage' box?

That's a somewhat recent addition, and it does help somewhat with the Photo library problem. It sucks if you don't have a fast internet connection, though. It also sucks if there's ever a problem with the photo library, because then you don't have a backup anymore. Maybe 240GB are enough for light usage if you store photos in the cloud. I can only say that in my experience 1TB is the bare minimum if I don't want to s…

Optimize Storage has been there since like macOS 10.13 (2017). You're commenting about M1 machines released 2020.

Re: Apple Mac Studio

#612

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"With the limited space they have"? They chose how much space they had to work with...

Because nobody outside hardcore computer nerds wants a beige box tower with 14 drive bays sitting on their desk. People want quite little boxes that gets work done without having to have dedicated room for loud machines.

Given the amount of people using Apple desktop gear across the planet and beige box towers, I beg to differ.

Re: Apple Mac Studio

#613

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't think anyone besides hardcore computer nerds actually care what their computers look like. Lest we repeat the sins of The Trash Can Mac...

For people with big clunky PC boxes, they stick it under a desk or on the floor because that's where it fits and it's out of sight. Because of the "sleek" design and smaller size, Apple has people convinced that the computer should be like children in the '50s--seen but not heard. If you offer someone a computer in the shape of the mac mini or this new studio design OR they could have a typical PC style box, I'm gues…

The keyword being offer, as long as they don't have to pay for it.

Re: Apple Mac Studio

#614

I would like to highlight just how much Apple is focusing on their customers and use cases right now. It seems that they're targeting products to what their professional customers actually want. And in this case, it's a 3.7" little thing that can process 18 streams of 8k video (fully specced out). That's kinda crazy, and they're doing it at a price point that's competitive compared to all of the companies out there.…

As a programmer, data scientist and macOS user, I have to say I'm just annoyed by Apple these years. They've built a preset of users who may use their products, on that list are "Creative producers", etc. I'm not saying creative works aren't important - I personally enjoy poems, movies and photography very much. But just imagine how many MacBook Pros and other products Apple sell each year - does the world need that…

how does the targeting for creatives hinder the machines usage for programming? macs are among the best computers for coding and data science. huh?

Re: Apple Mac Studio

#615

I would like to highlight just how much Apple is focusing on their customers and use cases right now. It seems that they're targeting products to what their professional customers actually want. And in this case, it's a 3.7" little thing that can process 18 streams of 8k video (fully specced out). That's kinda crazy, and they're doing it at a price point that's competitive compared to all of the companies out there.…

As a programmer, data scientist and macOS user, I have to say I'm just annoyed by Apple these years. They've built a preset of users who may use their products, on that list are "Creative producers", etc. I'm not saying creative works aren't important - I personally enjoy poems, movies and photography very much. But just imagine how many MacBook Pros and other products Apple sell each year - does the world need that…

That has always been their target market since forever, even developer tools on Mac OS classic were eventually outsourced to Code Warrior and PowerPlant C++ framework.

Re: Apple Mac Studio

#616

Earlier quoted context omitted.

High performance PC can't be too laud unless you designed as loud, but can be too big.

If you packed those specs in to something twice the size of the mac studio it would sound like a loaded up server rack on your desk. Yes you can get absolutely massive coolers which are quiet but nothing nearly as portable as this.

Yes, the tradeoff won't chosen.

Re: Apple Mac Studio

#617

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Because nobody outside hardcore computer nerds wants a beige box tower with 14 drive bays sitting on their desk. People want quite little boxes that gets work done without having to have dedicated room for loud machines.

The advantage of a huge beige box ( mine is white actually) is that easy airflow and acoustic padding makes them pretty quiet. But yes huge. Mine is 24" x 20" x 10". And very heavy. Not on my desk.

Well, Apple claims that this little box will stay "whisper quiet" anyways.

Also, I'm pretty excited to replace my big tower with this thing and finally get my computers off the floor.

Re: Apple Mac Studio

#618

Earlier quoted context omitted.

As a programmer, data scientist and macOS user, I have to say I'm just annoyed by Apple these years. They've built a preset of users who may use their products, on that list are "Creative producers", etc. I'm not saying creative works aren't important - I personally enjoy poems, movies and photography very much. But just imagine how many MacBook Pros and other products Apple sell each year - does the world need that…

how does the targeting for creatives hinder the machines usage for programming? macs are among the best computers for coding and data science. huh?

idk, like having no considerations for data integrity? Because like single 1-bit error in a 2-hour movie file just don’t matter, though it might for like, molecular biology research. idk tho.

Re: Apple Mac Studio

#619
post #518

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If that was really a consideration that correlated strongly to success, the market would've shown that a while ago and the most successful projects would sail through Apple approvals. However, this is not reality, and when our philosophy fails to describe reality, only one of those two things is capable of changing.

Mobile games have been bigger than PC or console for awhile, and a few of the titles are massively popular and profitable. Though App Store review policies differ in permissiveness, the approach from below has been the industry model both on iOS and Android. Remind me what you were saying needs to change.

> Mobile games have been bigger than PC or console for awhile

Of course mobile games are "bigger" than PC games. It's because today 18yos use mobile phones to "type" their homework. It's because they have never actually used or owned a computer/mac keyboard. It's because +80% of visitors of all web pages come from mobile.

It's because everyone has a mobile phone, and relatively fewer people use or own a classic computer. It says nothing about the scale of mobile gaming. It says everything about the scale of mobile.

Re: Apple Mac Studio

#620

Earlier quoted context omitted.

High performance PC can't be too laud unless you designed as loud, but can be too big.

If you packed those specs in to something twice the size of the mac studio it would sound like a loaded up server rack on your desk. Yes you can get absolutely massive coolers which are quiet but nothing nearly as portable as this.

Do you have a reference on how quiet these are? I mean it’s fantastic if true but half the reason my MBP gathers dust is the noise under load compared to my (almost) silent 5950x under load. But yes it’s a big box that I have no intention of moving.
Post reply on HN