Live data from Hacker News

Grok 4.3

docs.x.ai

601–608 of 608 posts

Re: Grok 4.3

#601

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Deepseek is fairly uncensored. I tried pushing it and reached my limits before it did.

Is this satire? Ask it about June 4 1989, Taiwan independence, or Winnie the Pooh.

Not that you're wrong, but I think they were talking about it from a technical POV. I use deepseek to write exploits and red team("Malicious" code). It's alignment is under different values so it's nice to be able to at least swap between models for different uses.

Re: Grok 4.3

#602
post #48

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

Musk bought a social media company for the specific purpose of getting Trump elected by turning it into a right wing propaganda machine. Have Anthropic/OpenAI/Google done something similar to that?

Even worse, they exercise bias on a daily basis.

Re: Grok 4.3

#603

Earlier quoted context omitted.

When I look at the person behind it all, I have to wonder how the hell people can even consider using grok? Or using Twitter? Or any of that. Using any of those things puts money in Musk's pockets and further enables and encourages him to continue being a Neo-Nazi wannabe. Do they think it's just a phase?

Do you drive BMW or VW car? Boy do I have news for you!

I'm perfectly well-aware of their history. You'd be hard-pressed to find a large modern German industrial without a swastika in their history. I'm also well-aware that they are not currently Nazi sympathizers (as a corporation), unlike Elon Musk.

For the record, my last three cars have been VWs. Not the greatest car, but decent, and affordable.

Re: Grok 4.3

#604
post #535
post #284

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm rooting for the china models so I can run it at home. Qwen is getting pretty good for how big it is. Idgaf about this asshole and his mechahitler.

It's so amusing to see people despising Musk in the same breath that they declare support for a brutally authoritarian government.

Not supporting, just downloading their model. And it's not a CSAM generator.

Re: Grok 4.3

#605

Earlier quoted context omitted.

She's 50 years old has a doctorate in pharmacy and has worked as a hospital pharmacist for two decades. I don't say this as a "gotcha", but more that even with all that experience she still finds it beneficial and helpful.

That makes it more sad, to me. Someone with those credentials should be able to communicate with their colleagues effectively. I wonder if she used to be able to. It appears Hacker News disagrees that social skills are valuable skills. Mea culpa, I should have guessed.

Navigating tough conversations takes time, attention, and mental energy. I’d rather a pharmacist spend that time on catching another dangerous contraindicated combo of drugs for a different patient. Actually, AI should soon be checking for that, too.

Re: Grok 4.3

#606
post #501
post #363

I just refuse to use Grok after seeing Elon Musk openly manipulating its output.

ChatGPT would conveniently throw an error when asked about allegations against Sam. Claude doesn't like openclaw, refusing requests or charging extra if it sees the word. IMO Elon's manipulation is nothing compared to that.

Forcing an LLM to have extreme right-wing behavior has a much bigger negative impact in society than not liking openclaw or not answering things about Sam.

Re: Grok 4.3

#607

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It was a joke about people relying on AI and it doing absolutely terrible things. Coding is an interesting area -- it can code, then compile to see if that part worked, then test to see if more worked. With taxes, it sets things up and the review phase is the IRS fining you.

in this case my tax situation is so retarded simple, I could verify what it suggested step by step and I performed the actions on one of those free tax usa website. the irs accepted my returns and everything went fine. if you're in a simple tax situation, try it!

oh, I’ve had the IRS accept and then later fine more than once.

But if you are in a common situation, any llm should be quite helpful.

Re: Grok 4.3

#608

Earlier quoted context omitted.

congratulations, you have solved anti-scam. go make your billion since its easy.

its easy to solve at the offline level where you have time to filter out. in fact this is already done in pre-training by OpenAI and other companies. you think its hard?

Yes I think it's hard.

OpenAI has already been proven to be easily gamed through very unsophisticated poisoning (fake information in a web page + an edit to a wiki page pointing at it, fake information in a reddit post), so I'm not sure we shoudl hold up their efforts at data cleaning as a gold standard.

https://www.sei.cmu.edu/blog/data-poisoning-in-ai-models-the...

Post reply on HN