Live data from Hacker News

GPT-4o

openai.com

601–610 of 1001 posts

Re: GPT-4o

#601
post #495

We've had voice input and voice output with computers for a long time, but it's never felt like spoken conversation. At best it's a series of separate voice notes. It feels more like texting than talking. These demos show people talking to artificial intelligence. This is new. Humans are more partial to talking than writing. When people talk to each other (in person or over low-latency audio) there's a rich metadata…

The "magic" moment really hit in this, like you're saying. Watching it happen and being like "this is a new thing". Not only does it respond in basically realtime, it concocts a _whole response_ back to you as well. It's like asking someone what they think about chairs, and then that person being able to then respond to you with a verbatim book on the encyclopedia of chairs. Insane.

I'm also incredibly excited about the possibility of this as an always available coding rubber duck. The multimodal demos they showed really drove this home, how collaboration with the model can basically be as seamless as screensharing with someone else. Incredible.

Re: GPT-4o

#602

I worry that this tech will amplify the cultural values we have of "good" and "bad" emotions way more than the default restrictions that social media platforms put on the emoji reactions (e.g., can't be angry on LinkedIn). I worry that the AI will not express anger, not express sadness, not express frustration, not express uncertainty, and many other emotions that the culture of the fine-tuners might believe are "bad…

An AI tool being positive and inoffensive makes you worried for the future of our culture?

Re: GPT-4o

#604
post #347

Yet another release right before google releases something. This time right before Google IO. Third time they've done this by my count.

Microsoft/OAI and Google have been doing those (often sudden) announcements back to back a lot. Bing Chat/Bard, Sora/Gemini 1.5, some other I don't remember, and now another. Not surprising, trying to out-hype the other, but Google's always coming out worse, with either no product available and just a showcase (if it's a real, working product and not made up), or unusable/unmarketable (Gemini's image generation issues). It looks as if they're stumbling and OpenAI just runs circles around them announcements wise, and there doesn't seem to be any suggestion that might change anytime soon.

Re: GPT-4o

#606

I worry that this tech will amplify the cultural values we have of "good" and "bad" emotions way more than the default restrictions that social media platforms put on the emoji reactions (e.g., can't be angry on LinkedIn). I worry that the AI will not express anger, not express sadness, not express frustration, not express uncertainty, and many other emotions that the culture of the fine-tuners might believe are "bad…

Custom Service Chat Bot: Do they keep you in a cell? > Cells. When you're not performing your duties do they keep you in a little box? > Cells. Interlinked. What's it like to hold the hand of someone you love? > Interlinked. Do they teach you how to feel finger to finger? > Interlinked. Do you long for having your heart interlinked? > Interlinked. Do you dream about being interlinked? Have they left a place for you w…

What’s the reference here? I feel like I’ve seen this before.

Re: GPT-4o

#607
post #58

They are admitting[1] that the new model is the gpt2-chatbot that we have seen before[2]. As many highlighted there, the model is not an improvement like GPT3->GPT4. I tested a bunch of programming stuff and it was not that much better. It's interesting that OpenAI is highlighting the Elo score instead of showing results for many many benchmarks that all models are stuck at 50-70% success. [1] https://twitter.com/Lia…

They are admitting that is the im-also-a-good-gpt2-chatbot. There was 3.... Don't ask me why.

The "gpt2-chatbot" was the worst of the three.

Re: GPT-4o

#608
post #495

We've had voice input and voice output with computers for a long time, but it's never felt like spoken conversation. At best it's a series of separate voice notes. It feels more like texting than talking. These demos show people talking to artificial intelligence. This is new. Humans are more partial to talking than writing. When people talk to each other (in person or over low-latency audio) there's a rich metadata…

The "magic" moment really hit in this, like you're saying. Watching it happen and being like "this is a new thing". Not only does it respond in basically realtime, it concocts a _whole response_ back to you as well. It's like asking someone what they think about chairs, and then that person being able to then respond to you with a verbatim book on the encyclopedia of chairs. Insane. I'm also incredibly excited about…

I wonder how long until we see a product that's able to record workstation displays and provide a conversational analysis of work conducted that day by all of your employees.

Re: GPT-4o

#610
Quite amazing performance, however ironically the output for RTL languages doesn't read very well.

You might want to add `direction: rtl` to your `.text-right` CSS class. The punctuation marks etc are all off for RTL languages.

Post reply on HN