Live data from Hacker News

Promotion of alternative social platforms policy

help.twitter.com

601–610 of 790 posts

Re: Promotion of alternative social platforms policy

#601

Imagine if Meta bans all Twitter or Youtube links in your IG or FB posts?

I thought Instagram doesn't allow any links at all in posts.

This is correct, but you can still post any URL in your Insta posts, it just won't be clickable. Twitters rules expand that to the text itself, as well as "obfuscation". For example, posting "instagram dot com/username" is not allowed on Twitter.

Re: Promotion of alternative social platforms policy

#602
post #540

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yup. People were angry that a company they don't like bought Github. But if you look at what Microsoft actually changed, there's not much to complain. They even made private repositories free, and significantly reduced prices for many users. It's hard to stay angry at a company when they are giving you what you want for free! Twitter, on the other hand, wants to get users to sign up for a paid subscription and starts…

Free while there are alternatives. After they asfixiated the competition they're free to jack up the prices. Smart business practice really.

Right because it’s really hard for someone to set up a git server somewhere and change the origin.

Re: Promotion of alternative social platforms policy

#604
post #587

Let’s help people get off this ship Tools to migrate to mastodon: Archive your data and repost to mastodon: https://twitter.com/settings/download_your_data https://github.com/FGRibreau/import-tweets-to-mastodon Find accounts you follow on mastodon: Browser Extension - https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/mastodon-handles-i... Using API - https://debirdify.pruvisto.org/ (thanks @guerrilla) - https://www.movetodon…

unflwrs will export twitter bios, followers, following, and bookmarks, and profile pictures: unflwrs.syfaro.com

Niiice thank you!

Re: Promotion of alternative social platforms policy

#605

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Per my understanding: most important functionality is implemented in the client; clients can connect to any relay server, and any number of relay servers; messages can be relayed by any number of relay servers; and anyone can spool up a new relay server at any time.

Ok. I will definitely have a look. My decision so far was to go and run a one-person Mastodon instance but this sounds intriguing.

I was able to get nostr-rs-relay[0] running in [0] https://github.com/scsibug/nostr-rs-relay

Re: Promotion of alternative social platforms policy

#607

(from another thread) Any attorneys want to weigh in on whether - or when - this becomes an anti-competitive/anti-trust concern, either in the US (FTC) or the EU? Related reading: * Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) Article 102, on abusive conduct by companies that have a dominant position in a market: https://competition-policy.ec.europa.eu/antitrust/procedures... . Any EU resident can file a co…

I don’t see how this is a legal problem for Twitter, at least in the U.S. They are not a dominant force on the Web or even in social media; they have little market power. And any data that shows lots of people leaving for other social media platforms would actually help prove that competition is strong (ironically). Free speech cuts both ways. It’s legal for Twitter to block links to Mastodon for the same reason it w…

Twitter is already actively regulated by the FCC and operating under a fairly strict regime.

Re: Promotion of alternative social platforms policy

#608
post #544

Earlier quoted context omitted.

One could argue a clear definition of "cross posting" should be provided before assuming it'd be allowed. A policy like this is going to have a chilling effect regardless, due to the ambiguity. It's also a quite absurd for a free-speech platform to even have such a policy in the first place, even if it's attempting to reign in "direct promotion" rather than sharing content across platforms. > At both the Tweet level…

> It's also a quite absurd for a free-speech platform to even have such a policy in the first place It does make sense for a paid-speech platform, though. Also, as a thought experiment, if Twitter were a part of the fediverse, wouldn’t this policy essentially be the same as defederating from the prohibited sites? I’m new to the concept of the fediverse, so I welcome edification or enlightenment on that thought experi…

No. If your instance defederates from another you can still link to it (though you might get banned if you link to something nasty, depending on your instance's rules). Defederating simply prevents your instance from automatically pulling posts from the other instance, aka the status quo for non-federated platforms.

Re: Promotion of alternative social platforms policy

#609

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I think he's hoping for a run in 2028. Possibly 2024, but that's a little close. One of the few requirements to become US president is that you must be a natural born citizen. So Musk is out, as he’s born in Pretoria, South Africa and neither of his parents were US citizens. https://www.usa.gov/election

To be president, but plenty of other government positions.

I doubt Musk would be interested in a mere government position where he has to act on the orders of a boss. Very few of those are open to elections in the first place, so he probably could have one if he just wants it. Apart from having a conflict of interest that would probably bar any reasonable president from offering one.
Post reply on HN