Live data from Hacker News

Google proposes changes to Chromium which would disable uBlock Origin

bugs.chromium.org

601–610 of 779 posts

Re: Google proposes changes to Chromium which would disable uBlock Origin

#601
post #333
post #310

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I might have to try that. Looks like you still have the tabs at the top of the window too, not sure I'd like the visual clutter.

Not very user-friendly, but you can disable the horizontal tabs by editing userChrome.css in your profile directory: https://superuser.com/questions/1261660/firefox-quantum-ver-... .

This is the up-to-date documentation for this:

https://github.com/piroor/treestyletab/wiki/Code-snippets-fo...

Re: Google proposes changes to Chromium which would disable uBlock Origin

#602
post #303
post #222

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Laying all the trans at one cripples my core i8 system for some time. Firefox's lazy tab loading is a much better user experience. Together with TreeStyle Tabs and the recent multi-container add-on, Firefox is just a better experience.

I used to be a fanatic about tree style tabs, but due to the new api, it's unusable with containers. I recently switched over to vertical tabs for that reason. I miss the tree layout, but at least now my tabs maintain their ordering.

All of my TST issues have been related to the layout cache. You can disable it if you right-click the toolbar icon.

Re: Google proposes changes to Chromium which would disable uBlock Origin

#603
post #589

Another reason to be glad that Firefox is still standing.

I find it rather odd that Googling "uBlock Origin" from Firefox does not return links to addons.mozilla.org - at all. The top result is of course the Chrome addon. The third result is the website for "uBlock" which is the unmaintained fork. Three pages in and you're getting dubious-looking repackaging sites, but no official addon. How on Earth does "Comorbidities Associated with Plaque Psoriasis | Dermatology Times"…

That's sort of weird. Searching DDG for "ublock origin" gives me:

1. Chrome web store

2. ublock.org

3. Microsoft store

4. Wikipedia

5. Mozilla addon, and finally

6. Gorhill's github for ublock origin.

Can we finally say that DDG is better for some searches than Google?

Re: Google proposes changes to Chromium which would disable uBlock Origin

#604
post #589

Another reason to be glad that Firefox is still standing.

I find it rather odd that Googling "uBlock Origin" from Firefox does not return links to addons.mozilla.org - at all. The top result is of course the Chrome addon. The third result is the website for "uBlock" which is the unmaintained fork. Three pages in and you're getting dubious-looking repackaging sites, but no official addon. How on Earth does "Comorbidities Associated with Plaque Psoriasis | Dermatology Times"…

I had to go to the last page and click "repeat the search with the omitted results included" to make it show up at all. After doing that it was the third result.

Re: Google proposes changes to Chromium which would disable uBlock Origin

#605
post #241

Earlier quoted context omitted.

People who feel that they have “nothing to hide” don’t quite understand the extent to which they’re being mined for personal data. Google offers all of this amazingly polished software for free so naive people like you will feed them your browsing history, email, location and search queries. They will then monetize that data by targeting ads to you, which generates over 80% of their revenue. If you are ok with that a…

> ask yourself if you’d be ok with [your browsing history, email, location and search queries] ever being exposed publicly. I already did, and the answer was "Yes, I'd be okay" (although the likelihood of that happening is extremely rare). > Ever googled something embarrassing? Use incognito mode. > Perhaps a medical condition or symptom? I have only one medical condition, which I'm not embarassed to talk about publi…

It is a shame that you are being downvoted. I (like a lot of people here) disagree with you, but you have a point of view shared by a lot of people. It's an important point of view to consider and engage with because my impression is that it's the majority view from the population - based on their actions, they don't care about their data privacy if it gets them gmail for free.

For a lot of people they possibly hold that view due to a lack of understanding about the situation, but some people like you understand the situation and still are OK with it. That's an entirely reasonable point of view which should be eagerly debated with.

Re: Google proposes changes to Chromium which would disable uBlock Origin

#606

The design doc — the part quoted in the note linked here even — explicitly notes that it will probably be required to retain some degree of the existing functionality slated for eventually removal until the new API and other replacements cover all use cases; the response linked here appears to (not improperly, in the context of making a case for why much of the functionality is needed) ignoring that and treating the…

There are four listeners with blocking ability on the webRequest API.

The design document says "potentially removing blocking options from most events". There is one mention that the blocking ability of webRequest.onAuthRequired may still be required.

From this I deduce that the plan is to remove the blocking ability of the three remaining listeners with blocking ability

uBlock Origin uses two of these remaining blocking listeners, uMatrix uses three of them.

Re: Google proposes changes to Chromium which would disable uBlock Origin

#607

Another reason to be glad that Firefox is still standing.

I really just don't understand the obsession with Chrome, especially in hacker communities. Sorry Google, I feel "icky & gross" when I use you.

That's really how I feel about all browsers since Opera did a U-turn and re-made their product into a Chrome clone. Firefox can get quite close with a bunch of add-ons, but not enough.

Re: Google proposes changes to Chromium which would disable uBlock Origin

#608
post #191
post #112

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Firefox just doesn’t have enough advantages yet that would convince someone comfortable with Chrome to switch over. While privacy is an ever growing concern, it isn’t a strong enough feature for most people.

What are the advantages of Chrome over Firefox?

Translation is the only thing I open it for. The Google Translate website doesn't work as well as the real time functionality in Chrome.

Re: Google proposes changes to Chromium which would disable uBlock Origin

#609
The uBlock origin author's comment on the CR bug threads looks incorrect to me, for the following reason.

Chrome extensions have access to the 'debugger' API.

Debugger API provides access to remote debugging protocol.

Remote debugging protocol provides commands to intercept, filter and block requests.

Please see: https://chromedevtools.github.io/devtools-protocol/ and specifically the "Network" domain.

Re: Google proposes changes to Chromium which would disable uBlock Origin

#610

"Hi folks! Can we please move this discussion to somewhere it's not as noticeable? K thx bye!" doesn't address anything Sounds like Google devs to me!

Or perhaps it's because people are spamming their bug tracker from sites like Hacker News, preventing the necessary technical discussion from taking place.
Post reply on HN