Live data from Hacker News

Starfighter, Summer 2015

sockpuppet.org

61–70 of 112 posts

Re: Starfighter, Summer 2015

#61
post #28
post #26

Stuff like when Tom called me and asked if he could have a truckload of pork bellies (CME ticker:GBP. And: I told him no.) delivered to our house. Sadly frozen pork belly futures don't trade anymore and haven't for about 4 years (almost to the day), and the Globex contract was GPB not GBP. But whatever, that sounds like a cool story and you should tell the rest of it :)

It's been almost 3 years since we sold Matasano, 4 since Erin left, and a few years more to get to that story. Matasano started in 2005. Also: we're old. (The ticker is my fault).

I've heard many stories about traders letting their futures expire and having to take delivery of whatever commodity it was. I'm pretty sure they're all urban myths though. They probably just had to unload them quickly at a big loss.

I would love to be proved wrong if anyone has a story with evidence. Preferably with pictures of shipping containers arriving at a city office!

Re: Starfighter, Summer 2015

#62
post #5

I'm excited that all the AVR I learned reverse engineering mouse firmware isn't going to go to waste. I honestly thought it was knowledge I would never use again.

Is there a 'why' behind that story?

https://www.usenix.org/conference/woot14/workshop-program/pr...

Re: Starfighter, Summer 2015

#63
post #28

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's been almost 3 years since we sold Matasano, 4 since Erin left, and a few years more to get to that story. Matasano started in 2005. Also: we're old. (The ticker is my fault).

I've heard many stories about traders letting their futures expire and having to take delivery of whatever commodity it was. I'm pretty sure they're all urban myths though. They probably just had to unload them quickly at a big loss. I would love to be proved wrong if anyone has a story with evidence. Preferably with pictures of shipping containers arriving at a city office!

Delivery was always at an established market point. Also, brokers would never let retail customers take delivery and would close out the trade because they would be at risk too.

Re: Starfighter, Summer 2015

#65
post #35

> I don’t really like games. > Yeah, so… I was planning on telling you more about our game. > Just two months ago, Tom and I were driving to the grocery store The announcement read like a mentally disturbed love letter about the typical idea guy stream of consciousness. Good luck, but I had to unsubscribe to prevent the arrival of any more...whatever that was.

The world has way too much bland corporate/HR sanitized writing as it is. Besides when you are married to someone who is your equal and then some that is how some conversations go :)

Re: Starfighter, Summer 2015

#67
post #28

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's been almost 3 years since we sold Matasano, 4 since Erin left, and a few years more to get to that story. Matasano started in 2005. Also: we're old. (The ticker is my fault).

I've heard many stories about traders letting their futures expire and having to take delivery of whatever commodity it was. I'm pretty sure they're all urban myths though. They probably just had to unload them quickly at a big loss. I would love to be proved wrong if anyone has a story with evidence. Preferably with pictures of shipping containers arriving at a city office!

http://www.minyanville.com/businessmarkets/articles/futures-...

"Ideally, the broker will make sure everything goes according to plan," the Prince of Peanut Oil told me. "But I once knew a guy who was trading for himself. He bought six egg contracts, with each contract worth 18,000 cartons of one dozen eggs. That's 1,296,000 total. The guy somehow made the mistake of taking delivery."

Re: Starfighter, Summer 2015

#68
post #47
post #35

> I don’t really like games. > Yeah, so… I was planning on telling you more about our game. > Just two months ago, Tom and I were driving to the grocery store The announcement read like a mentally disturbed love letter about the typical idea guy stream of consciousness. Good luck, but I had to unsubscribe to prevent the arrival of any more...whatever that was.

It's not like any other announcement. Is that a bad thing?

Well IMHO the whole "I had no idea what I was doing and it was really difficult to figure out that in the emulator memory-mapped registers must be (gasp!) mapped to memory, and Tom's mansplanation didn't help" doesn't exactly inspire a lot of confidence.

Re: Starfighter, Summer 2015

#69
Hmmm, personally, I have rather mixed feelings about this. I'd really like to be excited, but so far, I'm not. (And, on a somewhat tangential note, also I'm fairly surprised not to see any voices similar to mine here in the comments; am I the only one? hard to believe; or maybe others like me just shrug and don't bother to write? sounds more probable, to me at least.)

I tried to analyze my thoughts on that; I'll try to give some feedback/impressions, but please forgive if chaotic or otherwise flawed. So, in somewhat random order:

- I'm absolutely not interested in topic of "stock trading", or similar stuff. I'm not into trading/speculation, whether stock, currencies, or else. I don't like gaming others. Or PvP. So, if that's gonna be required, or important, sounds very much like something unfun to me. I like building stuff, and especially useful stuff. In my mind I characterize myself as "an engineer". And from this description, I don't see much in this area for myself. Even if I'm going to be building something here (some in-game "cyberdeck" of tools), I don't know how this could be practically useful for someone else, outside the game; so for now it sounds like wasted time and effort to me.

- From the original announcement, it sounded to me as an attempt at something revolutionary, appealing to a wide audience, and who don't have much free time they can put into this (but I may have overinterpreted, I dunno). Given my previous objection, I don't see how it is so, for now. Specifically, when/if I have free time, I prefer to put it into attempts at some open-source work, so that it would be useful to others, while also I could learn something. But when I don't have much time, I don't see how I could take part in the game in any meaningful way, such that my "score" could reflect my knowledge & abilities. In other words, for now it sounds like it requires some "grinding", and for me that sounds like wasted time (real world requires enough grinding). I don't really see how this differs from MicroCorruption (where I also didn't care to waste time on that), or other "CTF"s. Or, really, "an actual job". Only unpaid^H^H^H^H^H^H"paid" in virtual karma points/pixie dust ("score").

- The one thing that seems mildly interesting to me as of now, is the AVR theme. I'm somewhat hoping to dabble a bit in microcontroller programming (one of my many hobby project ideas). So, if I correctly understood that it's aimed to have a very faithful simulator of an AVR, I may at least learn something in this area, which may be easier than experimenting on real hardware. So, maybe the relatively "wide range of topics" (stock trading, AVRs, compilers, competition) might be the "revolutionary" aspect, so that there's higher chance everyone will find something for oneself? But if I'm willing to grind only on one aspect in-game, then my "total score" will probably be low, no? Unless at least the scores are multi-aspect, not totalled/averaged. Still, if I don't grind on other aspects, they won't show up in my profile, and will remain unknown to "potential employers", no? Also, back to the AVR theme, microcontrollers are closely related to electronics (i.e. very physical hardware: cables, soldering, analog voltages, timing, unexpected capacitances, coupling, etc.), and here I presume I won't be able to learn anything anyway.

All that said, I understand that this is kinda "2nd trailer announcement", and the stuff is not open to public yet, so the jury is still out.

Re: Starfighter, Summer 2015

#70
post #47

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's not like any other announcement. Is that a bad thing?

Well IMHO the whole "I had no idea what I was doing and it was really difficult to figure out that in the emulator memory-mapped registers must be (gasp!) mapped to memory, and Tom's mansplanation didn't help" doesn't exactly inspire a lot of confidence.

What are you talking about? That's not what she said. She pointed out that the stack pointer is a I/O register, which was in fact so weird that we did in fact argue about it (she was right, I was wrong). Why did she write about that? I don't know, perhaps because people who participate in Microcorruption are going to program AVR stack pointers?

"Mansplanation"? Really?

It feels like no matter what someone writes --- an emulator, a TCP/IP stack, a Montgomery curve implementation, the world's fastest SMT solver, whatever --- there is always somebody, who always writes like they sound like "that creepy booger-nosed kid" from King of the Hill, to tell us how unimpressive the accomplishment is. Thanks, Clark Peters! You've struck again!

Post reply on HN