Earlier quoted context omitted.
That paper does not implement training, only testing. Low-power testing is good to have e.g. for mobile applications, but it doesn't increase the capabilities of our algorithms. What we need to advance the field is faster training of larger nets. That's where the really interesting applications will be discovered. A convnet-optimized chip could clearly be much faster and more power efficient than a convnet running on…
Building a hardware convnet is only beneficial when you figured out the exact parameters of the network. Everything is hardwired. Therefore, it's useless if you want to experiment with lots of different parameters, tricks, or architectures to "advance the field". Moreover, building such a chip is an expensive and long process, and given how fast GPUs are improving, it's not clear that by the time you build it, it wil…
Neural network chip built using memristors
61–65 of 65 posts
Re: Neural network chip built using memristors
#62Earlier quoted context omitted.
Building a hardware convnet is only beneficial when you figured out the exact parameters of the network. Everything is hardwired. Therefore, it's useless if you want to experiment with lots of different parameters, tricks, or architectures to "advance the field". Moreover, building such a chip is an expensive and long process, and given how fast GPUs are improving, it's not clear that by the time you build it, it wil…
Maybe the brain can do one shot learning only after it has trained for years?
Re: Neural network chip built using memristors
#63This is one of the exotic devices in DARPA's UPSIDE competition for exascale computing. This initiative seeks to find non-state (non-transistor) based approaches to computation: exploitation of nanoscale response properties of discrete components to perform some restricted, non-binary, forms of computation. Essentially, exotic ways to abuse silicon lithography to get analog computation. The idea, and this can be seen…
You know, I think it's pretty funny (with a heaping helping of schadenfreude) that the first graphic in the first link shows some completely arbitrary "DoD Sensing Requirements" compared to actual processor capability. How exactly does one bridge the gap between our current processor capabilities and fucking omniscience ? I guess DARPA will try to find out.
Re: Neural network chip built using memristors
#64Earlier quoted context omitted.
How exactly is a memristor not a state device? And about journalistic coverage... you seem to be knowledgeable about these programs, so there's an opportunity for you :)
A lot of it is shrouded in secrecy I'm afraid, unless you're doing the research. I'm also very interested in memristors, I think it's a quantum leap forward for computing, in many respects. But there's very little information one can get out there. Would love to know where I can find out more.
[1]: http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v453/n7191/full/nature0...