Slack Raises $160M Series E at $2.8B Valuation
61–70 of 116 posts
Re: Slack Raises $160M Series E at $2.8B Valuation
#62Re: Slack Raises $160M Series E at $2.8B Valuation
#63This is pretty surreal for me. I tried out Slack briefly when they first allowed the public to request accounts. Made a mental note "cool", and moved on. The next year or so I started to see a lot more teams/companies that were getting on the Slack hype-train, and now this. Huge props to the team on this valuation but I'm still quite confused.
Valuations should be based on actual financials, but when it comes to tech right now they rarely are. Which is the definition of a bubble, IMHO.
Re: Slack Raises $160M Series E at $2.8B Valuation
#64My favorite thing about Slack is how they've thought of all the little things. My go-to example is that when they send you a notification email, it includes links to silence further emails with a single click. Obviously, this isn't a big "feature." It's not going to show up on their marketing materials. Nobody will ever say "hey, you should try out Slack because they let you silence emails." But it's this sort of UX…
Isn't this a legal requirement? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CAN-SPAM_Act_of_2003#Unsubscrib... Technically the law is only that you have to honor them within 10 days, but I've seen a bunch of sites with one-click unsubscribe nowadays.
Snooze these notifications for: an hour, eight hours, a day, three days, or the next week. Or, turn email notifications off. For more detailed preferences, see your account page.
"hour", "eight hours", "three days", "next week" are all links that silence the notifications for discrete periods of time. Pretty neat.
Re: Slack Raises $160M Series E at $2.8B Valuation
#65My favorite thing about Slack is how they've thought of all the little things. My go-to example is that when they send you a notification email, it includes links to silence further emails with a single click. Obviously, this isn't a big "feature." It's not going to show up on their marketing materials. Nobody will ever say "hey, you should try out Slack because they let you silence emails." But it's this sort of UX…
Isn't this a legal requirement? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CAN-SPAM_Act_of_2003#Unsubscrib... Technically the law is only that you have to honor them within 10 days, but I've seen a bunch of sites with one-click unsubscribe nowadays.
Another example: when you change your password, Slack will send you a special link to sign-in on mobile so you don't have to type out your new password on a tiny keyboard.
Re: Slack Raises $160M Series E at $2.8B Valuation
#66Do platforms like Slack really offer a great benefit to a business? Maybe I'm being cynical, but it seems that if you had a dysfunctional organisation then this is not a silver bullet, and if you had a well functioning organisation you would manage just fine with old fashioned tools like email and Dropbox. > Support for private groups and 1:1 direct messaging gives you complete flexibility. Private things stay privat…
Yes. The main alternative I've seen at a couple largish corporations is Microsoft communicator/lync. Lync has some good video/screensharing stuff, but slack is more reliable and provides a great search history feature, which is the killer feature IMO. Also, the mac client is much less buggy than what MS offers. I know these sound like tiny features, but Slack is there when you need it and stays out of your way when you don't, which is priceless when you're trying to get stuff done. Communicator always had a knack for crashing when I was trying to search history or in the middle of a chat.
For those saying IRC is a good alternative, I've yet to see a deployment as useful and easy to use as Slack. Obviously IRC is cheaper, but I doubt most bigcorps are too price sensitive for messaging systems.
Re: Slack Raises $160M Series E at $2.8B Valuation
#67For those of us outside of Silicon Valley who don't have the same funding climate, what's it like?
Re: Slack Raises $160M Series E at $2.8B Valuation
#68My favorite thing about Slack is how they've thought of all the little things. My go-to example is that when they send you a notification email, it includes links to silence further emails with a single click. Obviously, this isn't a big "feature." It's not going to show up on their marketing materials. Nobody will ever say "hey, you should try out Slack because they let you silence emails." But it's this sort of UX…
Isn't this a legal requirement? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CAN-SPAM_Act_of_2003#Unsubscrib... Technically the law is only that you have to honor them within 10 days, but I've seen a bunch of sites with one-click unsubscribe nowadays.
> It [CAN-SPAM Act] exempts "transactional or relationship messages."
Re: Slack Raises $160M Series E at $2.8B Valuation
#69A series E seems fairly late stage of a round for how young the company is...
Re: Slack Raises $160M Series E at $2.8B Valuation
#70For those that are confused about the value of Slack – It's not just about text chat. It's about comprehensive search and combatting organizational forgetfulness and knowledge drain. If we put it on Slack, it's archived "forever" and a team member a few years from now can start with a Slack search before re-inventing the wheel. This is especially evident with the integrations. If just the relevant slice of data is fe…
They are far from achieving that vision. I agree that company-searchable chat (and email) is valuable, but I doubt it will ever replace proper internal documentation--any other approach is far too noisy, and without a lot of context it's impossible to know if correspondence about an issue from two years ago is still relevant today.