Live data from Hacker News

The Dark side of .io TLD

thedarksideof.io

61–70 of 81 posts

Re: The Dark side of .io TLD

#61

Not to ignore the bigger issue, but the site implies .io would belong to the Chagossian people today if this hadn't happened. But the IO country code is derived from "British Indian Ocean Territory". Is it likely that the Chagos Archipelago would have this ISO 3166 code if the deportation hadn't occurred?

Well, it would still be in the Indian Ocean, for a start.

However, if you look at the list of .cX TLDs, all possible obvious results are already taken by (alguably) bigger states: Switzerland, Canada, Congo, Colombia and .. well .cs is complicated.

That still leaves room for solutions like .ic (Islands of Chagos), in a similar vein to .im for the Isle of Man, and you could have cool domain hacks like fanf.ic or grabthem.ic.

Or, since Diego Garcia is the largest island, .dg, and cash out from D&G.

Re: The Dark side of .io TLD

#62
post #28
post #26

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'll just buy the TLD ".rio", and have "b.rio" and "mercu.rio". I don't understand the big deal here.

For .rio, you need an address in Rio. Often, this is rather strongly enforced, see .ie and .cat for other examples.

Requirements for .cat are easily gamed. You need some "Catalan content" on your site, but this can be as little as a single page. Or see nyan.cat for a humorous implementation.

Re: The Dark side of .io TLD

#64
post #14

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think the key is in who gets to define what is "proper" compensation.

There's no number high enough- at the end of the day people will just cry out "amagad but our homes!" and claim that that's priceless and forever want money and sympathy from everyone. A line must be drawn somewhere.

As long as the line is more on the side of the majority feeling it fair as opposed to a certain minority feeling it advantageous, then I'm fine with that.

Re: The Dark side of .io TLD

#65
post #19

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It isn't a charity as far as I can tell (or at least does not have UK charitable status): the only registered charity with Chagos in the name is the Chagos Conservation Trust[1]. This means that UK Chagos Support Association does not have to follow charity law (i.e. be open about their work among other things), have a purpose considered as "charitable" [2], be run my trustees that don't personally benefit and/or be r…

Thanks for the detailed answer. Even if the law doesn't require it, I'm pretty wary of donating to a cause that doesn't voluntarily open its books. And I say that as a .IO owner who was ready to get out my credit card.

Hi all, my name's Stefan Donnelly and I am the Committee Chair of UK Chagos Support Association. Firstly, thanks for the donations for those who have chipped in!

To answer some of the questions raised about our group, we are not a registered charity. We did attempt to register but were told our aims were too overtly political to qualify as a charity. So yes we are a non-profit, entirely voluntary I should add, we have no paid staff and committee members get nothing for their work.

On where the money goes, its pretty evenly split between supporting Chagossian community projects (including training classes and Chagos Islands football team), supporting impoverished Chagossians in times of hardship and campaigning for Chagossian right to return.

Over the past year we have done a lot on the latter as the previous Government committed to 'resolving the issue,' though then did not do so. This is everything from paying for transport to protests and printing materials to promoted posts of Facebook.

For reasons of scale we haven't in the past arranged to be audited or published full accounts as it just wouldn't have been worth it for the small amount of money and limited donor base we had. As we look to fundraise more online, however, I appreciate it is reassuring to have that bit of extra detail and I think our next AGM will publish much more substantial reports on our income and spending, which we'll be happy to make public.

The point has been made before to me that the Gmail address looks at bit dodgy and transferring it over to the @chagossuport address (which we do actually hold) is certainly on the to-do list.

Hope that's answered some of the, very legitimate, concerns raised. If anyone has any further questions, on this or anything else about the campaign, feel free to ask

Re: The Dark side of .io TLD

#66
Haha, oh wow. This is actually real?

The irony of it...holy shit it's painful. And listed supporters all having .io.

If people can't see the near-masterful irony here, you're already lost.

Has someone bought up thedarksideof.ly yet????

Re: The Dark side of .io TLD

#67

The archipelago was first settled in the 19th century, only about 1500 people were displaced, yes the British government mistreated these people by not properly compensating them because the US and NATO needed a military base in the region. However there are urban restructuring projects every day in western countries that displace more people without proper compensation than this incident. And while i understand that…

For us the argument is fairly simple. Resettlement of the Islands by Chagossians is possible, even maintaining the military base, and there is still will amongst the Chagossian people to do so.

Certainly internal forced replacement still happens and often has terrible consequences for people but internationally the Chagos situation is pretty unique, and what is especially unique is that something can be done about it.

(Link to a now slightly outdated page on our website on Return 2015 campaign)

http://www.chagossupport.org.uk/return-in-2015

Re: The Dark side of .io TLD

#68
post #32
post #17

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Sure, but there's still some good .io domains available exactly because they aren't cheap (right?).

I pay <40 USD / year for taco.io, I have no idea of how much million dollars (which obviously I can't afford) would taco.com be worth.

Mind sharing your registrar?

Re: The Dark side of .io TLD

#70
post #10

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[deleted]

These are not even remotely the same thing. There is no .io sponsored hitsquad that is going to murder you in an alley for dissent, literally nothing will happen from this.

How do you know? :) (I'm kidding of course....)
Post reply on HN