Live data from Hacker News

An Economic Model of the Rise in Premarital Sex and Its De-Stigmatization [pdf]

jeremygreenwood.net

61–62 of 62 posts

Re: An Economic Model of the Rise in Premarital Sex and Its De-Stigmatization [pdf]

#61
post #6

Interesting stuff, it's clear from this economics perspective that sexual behavior is tightly coupled to risks and societal influence. As birth control became more available, the risk of premarital sex went down dramatically. I think societal norms are slowly catching up with this, hence why "we" (i.e. Western nations) are more liberal now than say 70 years ago. Here's a related thought experiment: could ever increas…

As someone mentioned, looking at only divorce rates doesn't paint the clearest picture. The data isn't as consistent as I led on. It would be more accurate, and pretty much equivalent to the discussion, to cite the declining marriage rates.

Here's something interesting: bachelorhood is at an all-time high: http://cnsnews.com/news/article/barbara-hollingsworth/bachel...

What's common in articles like these is the implicit assumption that:

> Men are bachelors because they're failing to mature, falling behind in school and the workplace, etc, etc

How about a more economic argument, like in this submission? Or rather, why not just ask a better question - why are they failing to mature? The answers would be something along the lines of: there are no incentives to do so.

If women don't need to get married as much (lower demand), their price (standards) must therefore increase. E.g. "I'm not really interesting in having a sweet right now, but if it's a mousse chocolate cake..." Maybe the price rises past the point where it's worth it to buy, from the male perspective. Also this means less and less men can compete.

Re: An Economic Model of the Rise in Premarital Sex and Its De-Stigmatization [pdf]

#62
post #57

Earlier quoted context omitted.

My state, Indiana, just made it legal specifically to fire or demote people because of their LGBTQ preference. That was in challenge to the recent Supreme court case regarding Hobby Lobby.

Point taken. I should qualify my statement to be "many parts of the West", then. It's pretty unlikely that a person would be fired for homosexuality in New York, San Francisco, or Los Angeles, for example.

It wasn't really a point; it was more a warning to stay away. And if you're here (Like I am), try to get out.
Post reply on HN