Live data from Hacker News

Introducing Driver Destination

blog.lyft.com

61–70 of 123 posts

Re: Introducing Driver Destination

#61

Trying to charge people for carpooling, something we've traditionally done for free. The "sharing economy" isn't about sharing- it's about monetizing free things and taking a cut. This is not in any way improving humanity. It's a step backwards.

This is a great point. In some circles we would refer to this as commoditization (clichéd but effective). It seems to be a consequence of continued profit-seeking outside established and competitive marketplaces.

Re: Introducing Driver Destination

#62
post #49
post #46

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's extremely popular between DC/North Arlington and the southern and western suburbs. I used to work in Crystal City, and on my commute home I would see dozens of people -- probably more than 30 most days -- lined up at the designated slug line stop.

That's crazy that I never heard about it. Is it a recent thing? Very cool that it has taken off regardless, and I suppose serves as a proof of concept for Lyft/Uber.

Not recent at all; Wikipedia says it started in the DC area in 1975, and I definitely remember people using it when I was a kid, which would have been early '90s. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slugging

Re: Introducing Driver Destination

#63
So, will this work in Sweden? The Google Play page says nothing about geographical restrictions, but it speaks about "DMV checks" which I have no idea what it is.

Seems Americans sometimes forget that the internet is a global network.

Re: Introducing Driver Destination

#64
post #45

This could work really well for things like getting to Tahoe on the weekends too.

In that case, most people would want to ensure round-trips, though.

That's not an issue with going to work?

This ride-sharing idea only works if both ends of the trip have sufficient traffic to promote carpooling.

Re: Introducing Driver Destination

#65

Trying to charge people for carpooling, something we've traditionally done for free. The "sharing economy" isn't about sharing- it's about monetizing free things and taking a cut. This is not in any way improving humanity. It's a step backwards.

Usually the person getting a ride pitches in for gas/parking/tolls etc, so it's not entirely free. Also, I'd be more comfortable giving rides to strangers if I knew they've been cleared through a background check.

Re: Introducing Driver Destination

#67

Earlier quoted context omitted.

No money changes hands This might be a small detail that matters big if you start driving for Lyft. What does your personal auto insurance policy cover if a paying passenger gets hurt in an accident in your car?

Lyft has a $1M insurance policy to cover their drivers. Here's an incident: http://www.cnet.com/news/after-fatal-lyft-crash-insurance-qu...

How the hell can they afford that?

Re: Introducing Driver Destination

#68

Trying to charge people for carpooling, something we've traditionally done for free. The "sharing economy" isn't about sharing- it's about monetizing free things and taking a cut. This is not in any way improving humanity. It's a step backwards.

Lyft is handling all the logistics and that isn't free, paying a small fee to reduce congestion in the city is "going forward" in my book.

Re: Introducing Driver Destination

#69
post #7

Shared carpooling (called "slugging" here) has a been a viable commuting option for people in the DC area for decades. No money changes hands; the point is that a car with 3+ people can use the much faster HOV lanes. http://www.slug-lines.com/Slugging/About_slugging.asp

How are HOV lanes in DC? In SoCal my experience has been that if the traffic is bad, the car pool lanes are just as backed up.

Having lived only in DC and SF bay area, I find HOV lanes to be much faster relative to traffic in DC. The data is less reliable, but I also observed HOV cheating to be much more common in CA, and enforcement to be stronger in DC.

Re: Introducing Driver Destination

#70
post #20

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't think this is a small market at all. I was in SF a few weeks ago and was shocked by how cheap and effective Lyft Line is - it ended up being comparably priced to public transportation in terms of getting around the city. (A tad more expensive, yes, but not an order of magnitude more, as I would have expected). I've already heard of people using Lyft Line in this way (making money on the way to work), and I im…

Hmm, this makes me wonder if there's room in the market for an app specifically targeted towards people who want to find carpool partners and coordinate schedules among carpool groups.

What advantage would this app offer over the Lyft app?
Post reply on HN