Live data from Hacker News

Welcome, cryptanalyst

146.148.62.204

61–70 of 71 posts

Re: Welcome, cryptanalyst

#61
post #58

6 lines of pythoncode for 1. puzzle. anyone less?

I believe we get puzzles randomly selected from a pool. Mine was about date parsing. Yours?

comparing two datafiles with suffled numbers to find matching pairs. all pairs have the same quotient. task was to find the quotient and return it as "improvement-ratio"

Re: Welcome, cryptanalyst

#62
post #60

Kinda surprised to be challenged like that suddenly, but managed to pull through with my (t)rusty regex-foo. Foobar is fun and well made! Passed the first challenge in a few minutes and will continue tomorrow. Try to start challenges on foobar only when you want the timer to start (e.g., not when you need to go to bed like me..). Thou shan't worry much on the first challenge though, it allows for 48 hours.

FYI, the time alloted to each challenge seem to increase with the difficulty (the first couple of problems are 48 hours, then 72, then 96, etc.).

Re: Welcome, cryptanalyst

#63
post #61

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I believe we get puzzles randomly selected from a pool. Mine was about date parsing. Yours?

comparing two datafiles with suffled numbers to find matching pairs. all pairs have the same quotient. task was to find the quotient and return it as "improvement-ratio"

Can confirm they're both different from mine. I got a palindrome problem.

Re: Welcome, cryptanalyst

#64

I passed the crossword! If you fill in the blanks with, say, "a" you can check your answers as you go. I'm now facing a small coding challenge: 48 hours to come up with code with Python or Java (my choice).

So level 1 has only one problem, 48 hours. Level 2 has two problems, 72 hours apiece.

Edit: Level 3: 3 puzzles, 96 hours apiece. How deep does this go?

Re: Welcome, cryptanalyst

#65
post #33

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The footer has links to Google. Unless Google is now doing movie marketing. This is also part of another game that was submitted a couple weeks ago which was a recruiting game for GOogle.

I got to that site through this movie trailer https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=sX... if you look at the paper at 3 second mark you can see the address "146.148.62.204". But now i wonder if its somehow connected with google

"The Imitation Game – Are You Paying Attention – The Weinstein Company"

Heh.

Re: Welcome, cryptanalyst

#66
post #63
post #61

Earlier quoted context omitted.

comparing two datafiles with suffled numbers to find matching pairs. all pairs have the same quotient. task was to find the quotient and return it as "improvement-ratio"

Can confirm they're both different from mine. I got a palindrome problem.

Pool seems to be limited though, had the palindrome problem, too.

Re: Welcome, cryptanalyst

#67
post #63
post #61

Earlier quoted context omitted.

comparing two datafiles with suffled numbers to find matching pairs. all pairs have the same quotient. task was to find the quotient and return it as "improvement-ratio"

Can confirm they're both different from mine. I got a palindrome problem.

Yep mine was summing the digits of a number until you reach a single digit number (eg 455 -> 5).

Re: Welcome, cryptanalyst

#69
I completed a few of these foobar challenges, and I'd love to keep working on them, but it seems to have stopped working for me. I can no longer save files in the editor, and I get a "Not Found" error when I run the verify command. Anyone else run into this bug (and maybe figure out a fix)?

Re: Welcome, cryptanalyst

#70
post #69

I completed a few of these foobar challenges, and I'd love to keep working on them, but it seems to have stopped working for me. I can no longer save files in the editor, and I get a "Not Found" error when I run the verify command. Anyone else run into this bug (and maybe figure out a fix)?

FYI: I tried deleting cookies again this morning, and everything is working again. The challenge I had finished (but was unable to save or submit) was showing as completed. Not sure if someone at Google took action on my bug report, or if everything just worked itself out.
Post reply on HN