Earlier quoted context omitted.
Sports. ESPN + NFL Redzone + TNT + Local channels in HD have no good alternative on the internet. If they did I wouldn't pay for TV.
Young people don't care about sports either. eSports like they have on Twitch.tv are more and more popular. A $35 leaf antenna from amazon gets you all the local HD channels for free.
AT&T to Buy DirecTV for $48.5 Billion
61–70 of 173 posts
Re: AT&T to Buy DirecTV for $48.5 Billion
#62Re: AT&T to Buy DirecTV for $48.5 Billion
#63Earlier quoted context omitted.
Sports. ESPN + NFL Redzone + TNT + Local channels in HD have no good alternative on the internet. If they did I wouldn't pay for TV.
Young people don't care about sports either. eSports like they have on Twitch.tv are more and more popular. A $35 leaf antenna from amazon gets you all the local HD channels for free.
Re: AT&T to Buy DirecTV for $48.5 Billion
#64Use this as a perfect example to explain to people why Net Neutrality matters. "What incentive does AT&T have to bring you good streaming experience for Netflix, Hulu, or heck even Youtube when they'd much much MUCH rather you were buying DirecTV from them?"
http://about.att.com/story/the_chernin_group_and_att_create_...
Re: AT&T to Buy DirecTV for $48.5 Billion
#65Earlier quoted context omitted.
Sports. ESPN + NFL Redzone + TNT + Local channels in HD have no good alternative on the internet. If they did I wouldn't pay for TV.
Young people don't care about sports either. eSports like they have on Twitch.tv are more and more popular. A $35 leaf antenna from amazon gets you all the local HD channels for free.
ESports are MUCH more interesting for at-home watching.
Re: AT&T to Buy DirecTV for $48.5 Billion
#66Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yep, this is the case here as well. Paying Comcast for TV + internet because it's $15/month cheaper than internet alone. The cable box they sent me is sitting unpacked in the closet.
Can I ask where you live, and how much you pay? In the bay area internet only is marginally cheaper than any bundle. $99 for TV + 25mbps and between $66 for just the 25mbps. Teaser rates are $59 for the bundle, $29 for internet.
Re: AT&T to Buy DirecTV for $48.5 Billion
#67Earlier quoted context omitted.
Sports. ESPN + NFL Redzone + TNT + Local channels in HD have no good alternative on the internet. If they did I wouldn't pay for TV.
Yes! Cable = Sports. If they somehow decouple those two then I'm all Internet.
NHL Gamecenter
NBA League Pass
NFL Sunday Ticket (currently DirecTV exclusive via contract)
* I am assuming you are American and/or care only about the four major sports in the US. Not sure about futball, rugby, cricket, tennis, cycling, etc
Re: AT&T to Buy DirecTV for $48.5 Billion
#68Re: AT&T to Buy DirecTV for $48.5 Billion
#69Do many young people watch TV anymore? It seems like netflix + youtube scratches that itch.
Even for sports, there are numerous online streams (though illegal) that I will make use of to keep up with critical games like the NBA playoffs.
Other than that the content on TV is garbage, and all the good content I can pirate easily or watch on Hulu/Netflix.
Cable companies are fucked.
Re: AT&T to Buy DirecTV for $48.5 Billion
#70Earlier quoted context omitted.
When people say "free and open", that's context enough to know that they mean free as in freedom, not as in beer. Please stop using this silly red herring.
I honestly didn't perceive it as "free as in freedom" in the above context. That said, roads aren't that, either. Try driving on one without a license, insurance, using them in ways that are disapproved of / disallowed (speeding heavily, drinking and driving, etc) to see. Alternatively, use the road to play a game of football. I don't really think they're "free as in freedom", either.
Your argument is in the same vein as people who try to win the debate over if we have freedom of speech or not by saying we don't because we can't yell "fire!" in a crowded movie theater. Context is everything; you can't just ignore it conveniently because you're trying to save an argument that you made under a misinterpretation. Why do we have the 1st Amendment? Because the founders wanted to preserve the ability for people to make politically averse opinions in opposition to those in power, not because the founders wanted people to be to somehow able defy the laws of the natural world.
People are fighting for a free and open Internet, because it has value in being able to quick access to important and useful information without restriction, not because of some super-literal definition of "freedom" or because we want it for 0 dollars and 0 cents.