Live data from Hacker News

Dropbox for Business

dropboxatwork.com

61–70 of 129 posts

Re: Dropbox for Business

#61
post #39

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> If business reliability matters to you, Dropbox seems comparatively better. If you're comparing Drive to the Reader fiasco, keep in mind that Drive for business is a paid offering.

But so is google apps no?

Yes, and google apps for business continues to exist...

Re: Dropbox for Business

#62
post #39

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> If business reliability matters to you, Dropbox seems comparatively better. If you're comparing Drive to the Reader fiasco, keep in mind that Drive for business is a paid offering.

But so is google apps no?

[deleted]

Re: Dropbox for Business

#63
post #33

I understand that nobody likes a race towards the bottom with regard to pricing, but IMO Dropbox is playing their pricing a little over confidently right now given what competitors are offering. In both the comments on HN and the original thread pricing keeps coming up. And the response is that this is a great product and pricing is acceptable. I don't think so. Businesses switching costs are MUCH higher than consume…

> In both the comments on HN and the original thread pricing keeps coming up.

OTOH, the cost of a new MacBook Pro always comes up when looking to buy a new laptop, but that hasn't hurt Apple at all.

Re: Dropbox for Business

#64

DropBox really shines when it comes to the capabilities of their client. I installed Box from few months ago at work, and used it to share a few screencasts that I was working on > 200MBs per file about 10 files. I got home and fired up the home machine...For the next five minutes the internet connection was jammed. Turns out you cannot do a selective sync of only certain folders. This would be a very basic use case…

I agree that the killer feature with Dropbox is that it "just works". I jumped on the 50GB Mac mobile app special from Box.net a few months ago and upon trying to use their Box Sync desktop client I found that it just doesn't work. Bogged the machine down, was never able to properly sync files. I've got 50GB at Box.net that I don't know what to do with and I definitely wasn't moved to the category of a prospective consumer client.

Re: Dropbox for Business

#65

Dropbox at work: The proxy server is refusing connections They're just blocking the whole domain. (Edit for those of you who think I'm just trolling for effect. I work at a LARGE fortune 500 (think 250,000 people) and http://www.dropbox.com/ is blocked at the proxy. If your company is going to offer business services, to, hum, businesses, one should insure that one should be accessible from businesses, no?)

You do understand that it's the IT department at the Fortune 500 company thats doing the blocking, right? Dropbox has no control over your IT department, any more than you'd have control over my wireless internet.

And the question becomes: why is this IT department blocking the dropbox service?

Re: Dropbox for Business

#66
post #17

Unless they drop the price soon we're going to move away from them. It sounds silly to argue over $15/user/month, but in comparison to Google Drive it's just started feeling too expensive. I really like the product, but I don't know if any product in a commoditized space can sustain such a price premium.

Well, it's $15/user for unlimited storage. Google Apps is $5/user for 30GB for each user, and then you have to start buying additional storage with "licenses"[1] which brings the price a little closer to Dropbox if you have a lot of data. I only use a Google Apps account so I don't know how well the clients work with multiple accounts (private Gmail and Apps). Maybe Dropbox will handle it better? Obviously, Google Ap…

for unlimited storage

In the real world you have netowrk congestion and security costs that scall with "unlimited" in this context.

so its more about practical needs.

Re: Dropbox for Business

#67
post #17

Unless they drop the price soon we're going to move away from them. It sounds silly to argue over $15/user/month, but in comparison to Google Drive it's just started feeling too expensive. I really like the product, but I don't know if any product in a commoditized space can sustain such a price premium.

Remember that Google Drive doesn't have official Linux support nor a Linux cli only client. Dropbox has both. This is very handy if you have any servers, some developers etc.

Dropbox for Business also includes their unlimited backups (older versions of files).

Re: Dropbox for Business

#68
post #17

Unless they drop the price soon we're going to move away from them. It sounds silly to argue over $15/user/month, but in comparison to Google Drive it's just started feeling too expensive. I really like the product, but I don't know if any product in a commoditized space can sustain such a price premium.

For Dropbox, it is their core business. For Google, it's a drop in their massive bucket of cash that comes from advertising. If business reliability matters to you, Dropbox seems comparatively better.

If their business is dependent on charging significantly more than the competition then I disagree that it is reliable.

Re: Dropbox for Business

#69
I lost trust in Dropbox when it comes to the quality of their client and I would therefore not use it for business purposes.

* I've had two instances of near data loss where I could only recover data from the local hidden cache folder that gets deleted after a week. It had to do with a user error with moving out files from the Dropbox directory when the client was off - previous versions in the webapp can easily become corrupted this way.

* the Mac client is a total CPU hog since Mountain Lion.

Re: Dropbox for Business

#70

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You do understand that it's the IT department at the Fortune 500 company thats doing the blocking, right? Dropbox has no control over your IT department, any more than you'd have control over my wireless internet.

And the question becomes: why is this IT department blocking the dropbox service?

Exactly.. some businesses are just not friendly to the idea of automatic synchronization of their very private data to a 3rd party.
Post reply on HN