Live data from Hacker News

Phil Schiller Responds to App Store Dictionary Censoring

daringfireball.net

61–70 of 90 posts

Re: Phil Schiller Responds to App Store Dictionary Censoring

#61
You HN folks are full of it.

http://news.ycombinator.com/threads?id=sharkfish

I used what is marginally a "swear word" and was modded into oblivion and subsequently banned from HN for that infraction.

Some of you hate being reminded you are hypocrites. I have another account I use where I game you guys and get points. So this one is throwaway as well.

Re: Phil Schiller Responds to App Store Dictionary Censoring

#62

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I expect my kids to eventually outsmart anything I do to hide things from them, long before they are old enough to vote.

Okay. That doesn't change the fact that you can lock down Safari on the iPhone, in direct contradiction of your statement "The browser is far worse. And not restricted." Again, I agree with you in pretty much everything else you're saying. I just think its stupid to pretend like Apple is evil for this particular alleged hypocrisy - "Oh noes, they let kids look at porn without restriction in Safari but ban my dirty wo…

Apple is doing the filtering in the app store. People do the filtering on the browser. That is an important difference.

Re: Phil Schiller Responds to App Store Dictionary Censoring

#63

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Okay. That doesn't change the fact that you can lock down Safari on the iPhone, in direct contradiction of your statement "The browser is far worse. And not restricted." Again, I agree with you in pretty much everything else you're saying. I just think its stupid to pretend like Apple is evil for this particular alleged hypocrisy - "Oh noes, they let kids look at porn without restriction in Safari but ban my dirty wo…

Apple is doing the filtering in the app store. People do the filtering on the browser. That is an important difference.

No, it's not, at least not to the point you were originally making, which was that Apple has put in place a system of control for apps but not for their own browser - that's false.

Why are you hung up on this? I'm not saying "don't be pissed at Apple", I'm saying "don't be pissed at Apple for imaginary things".

Re: Phil Schiller Responds to App Store Dictionary Censoring

#64
post #18

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I agree with that but someone who has parental controls enabled may not. That's why the feature exists. The "dirty words in dictionaries" battle has already been fought in schools and libraries and it seems Apple is taking the same route. Some words are OK, some aren't. It's not as though an NC-17 rating on the App Store really causes any problems for a developer unlike a movie getting an NC-17 rating which is a big…

" It's not as though an NC-17 rating on the App Store really causes any problems for a developer unlike a movie getting an NC-17 rating which is a big deal still. " I wonder about that. I wrote the Nihongo app, which, like NinjaWords, kept getting rejected until I finally set the rating to 17+. When it was finally in the AppStore, friends told me that an " are you sure, since this app has Frequent/Intense Sexual Cont…

Well for one thing, Apple does not let you give out promo codes for 17+ apps, which is a big handicap for promotion of your work.

Similarly, I wrote the Jishobot app and had to change its rating up to 17+. I'm calling bullshit on Phil Schiller's response. Am I allowed to say that?

Re: Phil Schiller Responds to App Store Dictionary Censoring

#65
post #53

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes, exactly. Swearing is negative because of my perception. That doesn't make it correct or incorrect. And Apple is doing me a service when they rate those type of Apps as 17+. It's not censorship. It's about letting the consumer know what they are actually purchasing.

Cue religious fundamentalist iPhone users demanding they be protected from seeing information about evolution or other heretical belief systems - the point being that these judgment calls are terribly subjective. Should other dictionaries (which allow one to look up swear words) also be rated 17+, in your view? Serious question.

I don't want to be protected. I want to be informed.

Re: Phil Schiller Responds to App Store Dictionary Censoring

#66
post #43
post #9

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes. Gruber touts Schiller's response as 'thoughtful', but what Schiller says is inconsistent with Gruber's own excerpted reporting so far. Bottom-line: Dictionary.com's app contains 'fuck', was released in April (before parental controls), and now has an "age 4+" rating. NinjaWords was given 'fuck' as one of several examples of problem vulgar terms in screenshots and told to resubmit and/or wait for parental control…

Gruber consistently sides with Apple. He is, in essence, a fanboy. There are exceptions, and he's not a moron, so when there's community uproar and obvious stupidity he will say so. But his reporting is heavily pro-apple overall.

The thing I really hate is as an obviously intelligent guy with the influence to prompt a reply from an Apple exec his response is so... pathetic. That was not an encouraging and appropriate response from Apple, it was bullshit.

Re: Phil Schiller Responds to App Store Dictionary Censoring

#67
post #64

Earlier quoted context omitted.

" It's not as though an NC-17 rating on the App Store really causes any problems for a developer unlike a movie getting an NC-17 rating which is a big deal still. " I wonder about that. I wrote the Nihongo app, which, like NinjaWords, kept getting rejected until I finally set the rating to 17+. When it was finally in the AppStore, friends told me that an " are you sure, since this app has Frequent/Intense Sexual Cont…

Well for one thing, Apple does not let you give out promo codes for 17+ apps, which is a big handicap for promotion of your work. Similarly, I wrote the Jishobot app and had to change its rating up to 17+. I'm calling bullshit on Phil Schiller's response. Am I allowed to say that?

As of July 26th, it looks likes promo codes have been allowed again for 17+ apps.

http://www.tuaw.com/2009/07/26/update-promo-codes-are-now-al...

Re: Phil Schiller Responds to App Store Dictionary Censoring

#68
post #53

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Swearing is only negative because of your own perception. To a lot people they're just words, strong words, but not necessarily negative as you seem to imply.

Yes, exactly. Swearing is negative because of my perception. That doesn't make it correct or incorrect. And Apple is doing me a service when they rate those type of Apps as 17+. It's not censorship. It's about letting the consumer know what they are actually purchasing.

Did you read the article? It's an edictionary! That means you are only going to see curse words if you actually search for them. So what if you don't know what cunt or faggot mean (eg as a non native English speaker)? You shouldn't be able to find out? That's crazy.

Re: Phil Schiller Responds to App Store Dictionary Censoring

#69
post #54

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Do you really think he's talking about jive turkey, ho, bitch, nigga or dawg?

No, I think that where he meant 'extremely vulgar language', he mistakenly reached for a term that has racial connotations.

How is that a mistake? Should he screen every word that he ever tries to communicate to ensure that nobody could possibly misinterpret or distort his statements into something offensive? Or is it reasonable for a person to assume that their audience will not brand them a racist for using a term that in isolation has very little to do with race?

Do you honestly believe that Schiller was referring to race? If not, do you honestly believe that a substantial portion of other readers would have interpreted it that way? If not, do you honestly belive that it was unreasonable to use the term?

Re: Phil Schiller Responds to App Store Dictionary Censoring

#70
post #67
post #64

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Well for one thing, Apple does not let you give out promo codes for 17+ apps, which is a big handicap for promotion of your work. Similarly, I wrote the Jishobot app and had to change its rating up to 17+. I'm calling bullshit on Phil Schiller's response. Am I allowed to say that?

As of July 26th, it looks likes promo codes have been allowed again for 17+ apps. http://www.tuaw.com/2009/07/26/update-promo-codes-are-now-al...

Hey, look at that! Tried it and it works. Thanks for the correction.
Post reply on HN