Live data from Hacker News

Paul Graham Shares Lessons Learned From 630+ YC Startups

techcrunch.com

61–69 of 69 posts

Re: Paul Graham Shares Lessons Learned From 630+ YC Startups

#61
post #56
post #52

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm not sure there are Richard Feynmans in startups or similarly "soft" fields. There are. Game recognize Game[1] is a thing for a reason. [1] If you need this footnote then it doesn't apply to you.

Game recognize game, and you looking might unfamiliar!

;)

Wasn't quite expecting the violent downvoting though. Humour never goes well on HN.

Re: Paul Graham Shares Lessons Learned From 630+ YC Startups

#62
post #58
post #55

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is absurdly reductionist.

Assume for a moment that I don't know what you mean by 'reductionist'; why is it wrong?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reductionism[#]

In other words, you by failing to distinguish scaling phenomena (1->N) with a gating criteria (0,1), you are making an attribution error concerning the "essentialness" of your explanatory variable.

For example: co-founders are typically not "interviewed" for the job. But (a) their selection is essential; and (b) if you can find a co-founder, you can find any lesser employee.

It could be argued, that having the ability to "recruit" without formal interview is actually a more essential skill.

Re: Paul Graham Shares Lessons Learned From 630+ YC Startups

#63
post #53
post #51

Earlier quoted context omitted.

No, sir. That was all at once. I was expected to stand there with a calculator, add $4 to the wholesale price, then add another $3.

Commutativity of addition is not at all an obvious fact and I applaud your erstwhile employers for holding you to a higher standard of rigor.

Maybe it's just me, but I find it difficult to conceive of someone to whom, even after discussion and contemplation, (+4+3)=(+7) is not obvious. I suppose there are such people wandering the planet, however.

Re: Paul Graham Shares Lessons Learned From 630+ YC Startups

#64
post #56
post #52

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm not sure there are Richard Feynmans in startups or similarly "soft" fields. There are. Game recognize Game[1] is a thing for a reason. [1] If you need this footnote then it doesn't apply to you.

Game recognize game, and you looking might unfamiliar!

Great show: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8G4WroDKaX4

Re: Paul Graham Shares Lessons Learned From 630+ YC Startups

#65
post #35

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Aren't "interviewing skills" essential to founders? Isn't a YC interview basically a chance to pitch your company and answer probing questions about your plan? Seems like a pretty fair qualification to me...

Only if fundraising is your endgame, which admittedly it is for a lot of wantrepreneurs.

Fundraising is not a CEO's endgame, but it's very similar to the day-to-day of CEO work: promoting the company to others; being the public face; communicating clearly, concisely, and effectively; making sure that the company 'works' in all the ways that matter.

All of these are 'soft skill' competencies that hackers tend to downplay. But you need someone who can do this and do it well.

Re: Paul Graham Shares Lessons Learned From 630+ YC Startups

#66
post #51
post #50

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't quite understand your markup anecdote. Did time pass between the $4 and $3 markups?

No, sir. That was all at once. I was expected to stand there with a calculator, add $4 to the wholesale price, then add another $3.

Was there a reason why they did it that way? And did you have a reason to find it lacking?

Re: Paul Graham Shares Lessons Learned From 630+ YC Startups

#67

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Only if fundraising is your endgame, which admittedly it is for a lot of wantrepreneurs.

Fundraising is not a CEO's endgame, but it's very similar to the day-to-day of CEO work: promoting the company to others; being the public face; communicating clearly, concisely, and effectively; making sure that the company 'works' in all the ways that matter. All of these are 'soft skill' competencies that hackers tend to downplay. But you need someone who can do this and do it well.

I don't downplay the importance of those skills, but are they essential to all CEOs? Does every company need a public face? Absolutely not, at least not for startups, depending on your core competencies and what makes you a good CEO, the public facing stuff to the extent that it is necessary in any given company can be delegated.

Re: Paul Graham Shares Lessons Learned From 630+ YC Startups

#68
post #66
post #51

Earlier quoted context omitted.

No, sir. That was all at once. I was expected to stand there with a calculator, add $4 to the wholesale price, then add another $3.

Was there a reason why they did it that way? And did you have a reason to find it lacking?

Yes, there was a reason they did it that way. They were unable to comprehend that +4+3 = +7.

I found it "lacking" because it was tedious and exasperating to stand there with a little pocket calculator adding 4, then adding 3, to make price tags for hundreds of items, one at a time.

Re: Paul Graham Shares Lessons Learned From 630+ YC Startups

#69
post #55
post #35

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Aren't "interviewing skills" essential to founders? Isn't a YC interview basically a chance to pitch your company and answer probing questions about your plan? Seems like a pretty fair qualification to me...

This is absurdly reductionist.

Better than absurdly pompous...
Post reply on HN