Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Motorola Makes The Moto G Official, A “Premium” Phone Starting At $179 Unlocked

techcrunch.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

61–70 of 126 posts

Re: Motorola Makes The Moto G Official, A “Premium” Phone Starting At $179 Unlocked

#61

Post by dnissley »

YeahKIA wrote: post #10
freehunter wrote: post #9

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Woodside said that the average worldwide is more around the $200 mark. They say their target research shows that people are spending $200 on poor quality phones. If that's the target they're going for and that's what they research shows, I don't think they missed the mark.

Nokia has been making great windows phones for cheap like the 521 that routinely available for as little as 70 bucks. The hardware is lower spec as compared to this one but windows phone is known to run well on slower hardware. It will be interesting to see how well Android runs on this.

It seems very similarly specced to the htc first, the "facebook" phone, which is just about the best deal as far as used handsets go. I got mine for $140 shipped from gazelle's ebay store, and it has been a delight to use.

Re: Motorola Makes The Moto G Official, A “Premium” Phone Starting At $179 Unlocked

#62

Post by r00fus »

No way this competes with real high end phones like S4, HTC One, iPhone5 or later.

What it does is compete very well against the iPhone4, 4S, S3, and older premium phones.

If you're adding a line to a family plan and want a phone that isn't basic, then this becomes very appealing as the iOS/Samsung/HTC/Nokia alternative will cost you either a 2 year subscription, or be $300 or more unlocked.

Considering people will still buy iPhones because they want something simple, the attack is really against Samsung and other manufacturers.

Re: Motorola Makes The Moto G Official, A “Premium” Phone Starting At $179 Unlocked

#63

Post by jb17 »

patrickaljord wrote: post #39
mactitan wrote: post #23

From the article: There’s no LTE on board, which makes sense given the target market (growing, developed countries where LTE is in limited supply or nonexistent).

Such as France ;)

Or the UK.

Re: Motorola Makes The Moto G Official, A “Premium” Phone Starting At $179 Unlocked

#64

Post by ismail »

jonknee wrote: post #52
JeremyNT wrote: post #42

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It seems capable, but calling it "high end" is quite... generous. No LTE, 1.2 GHz CPU, 1GB RAM, 8GB storage - they made some obvious compromises to hit this price point. I think it's probably a smart play for Moto/Goog to target this space, but "high end" it ain't.

Note that the iPhone 5s also has 1GB of RAM and has a similar CPU speed (1.3GHz). I feel you on the LTE portion, but much of the targeted market has no opportunity to use LTE. Maybe they could have a Moto G+ that costs $50-75 more and includes LTE.

LTE is available in Africa. look into the mobile industry in Africa in some ways we have leap frogged . theres an entire generation of tweens whos access to the net is via mobile.

I Will never forget my visit to canada in 2009. I get there, purcuase a prepaid sim card, and data does not work. go back to the store, and I am told you have to have a contract for data. wtf? LTE/3g all cost the same here both on prepaid and and contract. As long as you have coverage.

Re: Motorola Makes The Moto G Official, A “Premium” Phone Starting At $179 Unlocked

#65

Post by ismail »

jonknee wrote: post #52
JeremyNT wrote: post #42

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It seems capable, but calling it "high end" is quite... generous. No LTE, 1.2 GHz CPU, 1GB RAM, 8GB storage - they made some obvious compromises to hit this price point. I think it's probably a smart play for Moto/Goog to target this space, but "high end" it ain't.

Note that the iPhone 5s also has 1GB of RAM and has a similar CPU speed (1.3GHz). I feel you on the LTE portion, but much of the targeted market has no opportunity to use LTE. Maybe they could have a Moto G+ that costs $50-75 more and includes LTE.

LTE is available in Africa. look into the mobile industry in Africa in some ways we have leap frogged . theres an entire generation of tweens whos access to the net is via mobile.

I Will never forget my visit to canada in 2009. I get there, purcuase a prepaid sim card, and data does not work. go back to the store, and I am told you have to have a contract for data. wtf? LTE/3g all cost the same here both on prepaid and and contract. As long as you have coverage.

Re: Motorola Makes The Moto G Official, A “Premium” Phone Starting At $179 Unlocked

#66

Post by sudomal »

jimktrains2 wrote: post #28

I guess it's not CMDA (Verizon) compatible. It sure looks nice otherwise, AND it has an FM radio. I hate that most new models have dropped that. EDIT: Reformatting

I suspect the FM radio has been added to help them to convert feature phone users. It's the sort of feature that's highly prized in countries outside of North America.

Re: Motorola Makes The Moto G Official, A “Premium” Phone Starting At $179 Unlocked

#67

Post by [deleted] »

ismail wrote: post #64
jonknee wrote: post #52

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Note that the iPhone 5s also has 1GB of RAM and has a similar CPU speed (1.3GHz). I feel you on the LTE portion, but much of the targeted market has no opportunity to use LTE. Maybe they could have a Moto G+ that costs $50-75 more and includes LTE.

LTE is available in Africa. look into the mobile industry in Africa in some ways we have leap frogged . theres an entire generation of tweens whos access to the net is via mobile. I Will never forget my visit to canada in 2009. I get there, purcuase a prepaid sim card, and data does not work. go back to the store, and I am told you have to have a contract for data. wtf? LTE/3g all cost the same here both on prepaid a…

[deleted]

Re: Motorola Makes The Moto G Official, A “Premium” Phone Starting At $179 Unlocked

#68

Post by VladRussian2 »

Zigurd wrote: post #18
ccozan wrote: post #2

I hoped it is based on the X8 architecture, but is just "normal". So it makes not sense to compare it with Moto X, is a different phone, different target, is no "little brother", more like a distant "poor cousin".

I would claim that "flagship" Android smartphones are an unsustainable business model. At first, Android needed faster phones that it was getting from OEMs, but they went way overboard. Samsung soaks up a lot of that excess horsepower with bloatware. Here is a $200 phone with 4(!!!) cores and a very robust GPU. Even that is probably a bit more than neccessary. Android 4.4 got some performance tuning. Once ART is the…

>The only thing a thumping CPU gives you is the ability to ignore what your bad apps and OEM bloatware are doing to performance longer than otherwise. Disable the boatware and clear out the sketchy apps you don't use and that Tegra 3 is just fine.

didn't work during previous 20+ years of PC era.

Re: Motorola Makes The Moto G Official, A “Premium” Phone Starting At $179 Unlocked

#69

Post by BHSPitMonkey »

darrenkopp wrote: post #17

This is great, I was ready to buy a MotoX until I saw it was $750 unlocked, when at the same time the Nexus 4 was only $350. I'm not surprised that they didn't sell that many of them.

I think you mean the Nexus 5.

Re: Motorola Makes The Moto G Official, A “Premium” Phone Starting At $179 Unlocked

#70

Post by Zenst »

jb17 wrote: post #63
patrickaljord wrote: post #39

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Such as France ;)

Or the UK.

UK does have LTE or 4G as some call it. Not that it is priced attractivly enough for anybody to use it compared to the lovely 3G deals out there. That and some of the 3G services are more than fast enough and I even used 3G for a game tornament few years back and won.

But it is out there and more than one network now - but I live in London so kind of spoilt compared to parts of highland Scotland still to see a mobile signal (lucky peeps).

But as said it is not priced well IMHO and if anything America may well have better price bundles with regards to 4G. Now 3G I think the UK is around 3x cheaper. Heck I get unlimited 3G and SMS and plenty of minutes for £15 a month, never seen anything as close for America. But that is a less dense area and later in the day to get 3G compared to the UK. So maybe they invested into kit that is more cheaply upgraded to 4G basestation wise compared to earlier models. But the UK is after all the size of a whole state in America and with that easier population density wise to cost justify rollouts. Albiet UK goverment flaffing about of spectrum sales and the UK mobile market getting burned by paying over the price for the 3G spectrum many years back (rare rare cose of a goverment selling something of not underpriced, indeed only case I can think of).

EE (aka was T-Mobile until they merged with Orange) https://explore.ee.co.uk/coverage-checker/?wt.mc_id=ON_EE_V_...

O2 http://www.o2.co.uk/4g/coverage-and-cities

Vodaphone http://www.vodafone.co.uk/our-network-and-coverage/uk-covera...

So 4G is out there, but price wise - naaa. That said it is not covering the entire UK, though I can find places in the UK which get no mobile signal 2G onwards. Have to love the highlands in Scotland.

Post reply on HN