61–67 of 67 posts
I call bullshit on the "pure css" part. Nothing works if you have javascript turned off.
This works if you don't have javascript on: http://fiddle.jshell.net/w5GFR/show/light/
I call bullshit on the "pure css" part. Nothing works if you have javascript turned off.
Not to detract from the creativity here, but the id attribute specifies its element's unique identifier[1]. Strictly speaking, this should never happen: ... [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/WD-html51-20130528/dom.html#the-id...
"strictly speaking" is right. It's invalid but all major browsers will handle the code just fine. Browsers are pretty damn forgiving. It's also an easy mistake to make. All someone has to do is create an element with an ID in a child template without checking to see if that ID is already used in a parent template.
On the note of forgiving browsers, I love how they are a very accepting interpreter of information, much like a human listening to someone's broken English and still understanding what is being said.
Is anything known about the author or license of this work? Will Comedy Central likely object?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yeah, I don't want to be critical -- just wanted to point to some other lower-level shapes that might be easier for others to learn from and build upon. 100% believe we need more dancing characters, not less.
It looks like you're designing a user interface. Would you like some help with that?
That was best left in that last century...
For the young ones: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Office_Assistant