Live data from Hacker News

Mark Cuban makes Shark Tank remove equity clause in contract

inc.com

61–64 of 64 posts

Re: Mark Cuban makes Shark Tank remove equity clause in contract

#61
post #53

While I love Mark Cuban, this move is clearly not just out of the "goodness of his heart". He is a savvy investor. The production company (Finnmax) was receiving the equity stake, not the sharks. He rightly felt that the clause was limiting the quality of startups trying to get on the show. Now that he's used his leverage to get rid of it, he will get better opportunities to invest in. He also gets the benefit of now…

He also doesn't have to share stake in a company with a detached investor who literally got paid to get the equity.

If you think about it it's kind of insulting to his time where his only payback for being on the show is payback from deals he makes.

Where as Finnmax gets paid to produce the show, then takes a cut of every company, and likely does little to help the company advance. This would be extra telling for multi-million dollar valuations where the sharks end up getting single digit shares themselves and are expected to bring many contacts and continue to work with and mentor the investors.

Re: Mark Cuban makes Shark Tank remove equity clause in contract

#62

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not sure what you mean. Are you having problems with the purchase process? Contact me via email and I'll get you a copy for free.

Glad I ran across this thread. Just the game I needed. Checking it out.

No.

Re: Mark Cuban makes Shark Tank remove equity clause in contract

#64
post #5
post #4

I know very little about him but this instantly makes me think he is a decent person at heart. (and retroactive too, nice detail)

He is strongly opposed to high-frequency/algorithmic stock trading as well. Plus, he is regularly the most-fined owner in the NBA for telling the officials that they blew calls in press conferences. At the very least, he's certainly entertaining.

As a fan of a rival basketball team (the San Antonio Spurs), I've followed Cuban for a long time. I don't really hold the fact that he's a competitor (and likes to talk smack) against him, and I'd say he's an excellent owner overall.

His complaints about the officiating are sometimes biased -- I'm not sure if it's because it helps team morale to complain about calls and make your players feel like you have their back, or just because he gets emotional about his team, which is certainly understandable enough.

Overall, I'd say he's probably the best marketing innovator in the league, though. Fans in the Metroplex have a number of different sports options and were spoiled by decades of Cowboys success, so they can be frontrunners at times and only care about their teams if they win enough to be seen as "interesting". In addition to helping make the team competitive and winning a title, Cuban has done a good job of building a strong fan base, one that isn't going to all head for the exits when they rebuild. That can be really tough to do, but he's made a lot of moves -- large and small -- over the years to make Mavs fans really invested in the teams and to make the in-arena atmosphere as fun as possible. And unlike some sports owners who are heavily involved in their teams, he knows how to hire experts at the game of basketball to handle the personnel and coaching decisions, and let them do their jobs with his support rather than feeling the need to interfere to satisfy his ego.

At first I wondered if he had any idea what he was doing given the seemingly freak success of broadcast.com (which he sold at its peak and which then fell to pieces not too long after Yahoo bought it), but over the years, he's definitely seemed like someone who knows how to make smart business decisions and bring on the right people.

I definitely wouldn't have any hesitation to do business with him, given the opportunity.

Post reply on HN