Earlier quoted context omitted.
Taking a lower-paid job can reduce your salary once you get back to your primary field. Workers have legitimate reasons to treat wages as sticky.
How can that happen? It's not like your new employer will know what you were making at the last job, and even so why should that matter?
Is LinkedIn Cheating Employers and Job Seekers Alike?
61–70 of 88 posts
Re: Is LinkedIn Cheating Employers and Job Seekers Alike?
#62Earlier quoted context omitted.
How can that happen? It's not like your new employer will know what you were making at the last job, and even so why should that matter?
They ask. Are you just supposed to lie or refuse to answer?
Re: Is LinkedIn Cheating Employers and Job Seekers Alike?
#63Earlier quoted context omitted.
How can that happen? It's not like your new employer will know what you were making at the last job, and even so why should that matter?
They ask. Are you just supposed to lie or refuse to answer?
Re: Is LinkedIn Cheating Employers and Job Seekers Alike?
#64Earlier quoted context omitted.
Refuse to answer. It's none of their business, and nobody can compel you to answer a question.
"I don't have to answer that." They can't compel you to answer, but good luck landing that job.
Re: Is LinkedIn Cheating Employers and Job Seekers Alike?
#65Earlier quoted context omitted.
How can that happen? It's not like your new employer will know what you were making at the last job, and even so why should that matter?
They ask. Are you just supposed to lie or refuse to answer?
That tends to be the route I go down anyway. At least when their position is good enough that I don't just walk out of the interview for someone being that rude, (i.e. I want to work with them for some other significant reason.)
Re: Is LinkedIn Cheating Employers and Job Seekers Alike?
#66Earlier quoted context omitted.
"I don't have to answer that." They can't compel you to answer, but good luck landing that job.
I have a hard time believing that if the employer is in desperate need, and a potential employee has the skills, they cannot come to an agreement, especially if you make it in for an interview. This does not make sense. Someone is not motivated enough.
Re: Is LinkedIn Cheating Employers and Job Seekers Alike?
#67Earlier quoted context omitted.
How can that happen? It's not like your new employer will know what you were making at the last job, and even so why should that matter?
They ask. Are you just supposed to lie or refuse to answer?
- I took a sabbatical
- I did private/contract work for a while
- I took a working holiday
- I spent some time renovating my house
- I took some time off to look after a sick relative
Take the Jesuit line that if there is a kernel of truth in the statement (eg you fixed your gutters one time while unemployed) then you're not actually lying.Really, this HR obsession with "zomg a gap in employment history" is pointlessly stupid and deserves to be gamed.
Re: Is LinkedIn Cheating Employers and Job Seekers Alike?
#68I think the broader principle of this post is solid. It's one that I've been thinking a lot as a friend asked me to advise his dating-site startup. I don't like the space for one major reason (and job hunting is isomorphic with dating): to optimize making money you have to fail to deliver on the expectations of those for whom you're matchmaking. With dating/jobhunting if you create a supremely efficient market place…
Re: Is LinkedIn Cheating Employers and Job Seekers Alike?
#69"Any headline which ends in a question mark can be answered by the word no."
Re: Is LinkedIn Cheating Employers and Job Seekers Alike?
#70Have to laugh because companies looking for the proverbial 'rockstar developer' are increasingly never going to find them on LinkedIn.