Earlier quoted context omitted.
Did you even read the article? It has nothing to do with EAS or Microsoft; it's Motorola software siphoning pretty much all the user's credentials off to Motorola servers.
Yes, I did read the article in its entirety. Did you? The author mentions ActiveSync more than once. *" What I am going to do as a result of this discovery As of 23 June 2013, I've removed my ActiveSync configuration from the phone, because I can't guarantee that proprietary corporate information isn't being funneled through Motorola's servers. I know that some information (like the name of our ActiveSync server, our…
[from the article]
*" I was quickly able to determine that the connections to Motorola were triggered every time I updated the ActiveSync configuration on my phone, and that the unencrypted HTTP traffic contained the following data:
The DNS name of the ActiveSync server (only sent when the configuration is first created).
The domain name and user ID I specified for authentication.
The full email address of the account.
The name of the connection.
As I looked through more of the proxy history, I could see less-frequent connections in which larger chunks of data were sent - for example, a list of all the application shortcuts and widgets on my phone's home screen(s)."*
Would someone please illuminate me as to why my reference to ActiveSync is alleged to be irrelevant to this conversation?