Earlier quoted context omitted.
As a consumer your only duty is to obey they law. However, moral duty is relevant when it comes to how society should think about debt. Everyone has things they would like to do if they had more money. Society should not be arranged to give people a free pass just because they want to do something that requires money.
> However, moral duty is relevant when it comes to how society should think about debt. A debt is a contractual obligation and should be treated as such. One should not moralize contractual obligations. E.g. During the housing crisis, there was a lot of moralizing about homeowners walking away from their underwater mortgages. Moralizing about debt in that way is bullshit. When lenders make a loan secured by collatera…
My point was that when society considers what it's goals are, it should never be a goal that a person should be able to do things that "give their life meaning" when they can't afford them, because ultimately it is a person's own responsibility how they manage their money.
So my post was aimed at people who thought "isn't it horrible that this woman can't do what she wants in life simply because she can't afford it"