Live data from Hacker News

Gmail: Introducing Actions in the Inbox

googleappsdeveloper.blogspot.co.uk

61–70 of 147 posts

Re: Gmail: Introducing Actions in the Inbox

#61
post #32

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It did? Using an open format? I've never heard of that. Do you know the name of the feature?

You keep harping on the "open format". So what? That doesn't change any of the talking points here.

Being an open format that can be implemented by any other mail client is, in my opinion, an important part of the feature, especially for those of us who don't use Gmail.

Re: Gmail: Introducing Actions in the Inbox

#62
post #39

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It did? Using an open format? I've never heard of that. Do you know the name of the feature?

> It did? Using an open format? As much as Web 2.0 enthusiasts loathe the fact, Microsoft actually invented XMLHTTPRequest. See http://stackoverflow.com/a/12067786/112125

What does that have to do with anything? Netscape invented Javascript. Oh look another random point that seems to provide nothing to the conversation.

I think it's pretty well aware Microsoft (or should I say a select few working on IE at Microsoft) invented "AJAX"

Re: Gmail: Introducing Actions in the Inbox

#63
post #58

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Both Microdata and JSON-LD are open formats.

The format may be open, the ability to use it isn't - you need to register with Google[1] or they won't display actions on your e-mail. This appears to be necessary for security reasons. Imagine if every e-mail provider did the same thing! [1] https://developers.google.com/gmail/schemas/registering-with...

That's bad, yes, and I wish they didn't require that, but it doesn't hinder the use of the protocol outside of their services, which is the most important thing. It just adds some extra work to the senders.

Re: Gmail: Introducing Actions in the Inbox

#64
super cool. we are doing something similar with Birdseye Mail's Smart Actions http://www.birdseyemail.com/developers ... we opted to reuse open graph tags in favor of creating a new JSON / JavaScript syntax

Still really great that Google signed up partners for the rollout. It's a bit of a chicken vs. the egg problem for technologies like this and it seems they have some cool email providers on board to help with the adoption.

Regardless of the outcome, this is great for consumption of emails and for users who have trouble dealing with their high volume of email.

Re: Gmail: Introducing Actions in the Inbox

#65
post #37
post #12

I'm expecting "this email designed for gmail" badges soon.

The feature appears to be independently implementable in other clients, so if it takes off and those badges start appearing, then other e-mail clients can follow. And some "designed for gmail" badges may actually be a good thing — maybe that would force Microsoft to do something with grotesque HTML rendering in the latest Outlook.

MS uses the Word HTML engine in Outlook since Office 2007. As well, CSS (even inlined) support when viewing mail seems to be pretty bad.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Outlook#HTML_renderin...

Re: Gmail: Introducing Actions in the Inbox

#66
post #2

new tool for phishing. perfect.

a company that inserts this type of response hook in their emails needs to register with google. the response interface looks clearly separated—its not in the body of the email—so there is no way that a phisher could fake it.

so it actually could help to SOLVE the phishing issue. especially if other mail providers sign on.

Re: Gmail: Introducing Actions in the Inbox

#67
post #49

Can the response include who is clicking the action? For example, if you want to take a quick poll from within an email that is sent to multiple people, can you identify who is voting for what?

This is usually done by generating different URLs for different emails. The URLs need to carry access token parameters. See https://developers.google.com/gmail/schemas/actions/limited-....

Re: Gmail: Introducing Actions in the Inbox

#69
post #57

The fact that this was posted on the Google Apps blog is telling- I imagine that Google wants to roll this out to Apps users before general Gmail users. I'm surprised by the reaction in here- yes, it's an addition to the standard e-mail system. Do we really want that system to stand absolutely still? If that's the case, why are we cheering so much web browser development? Surely a browser from 1997 should be good eno…

> I imagine that Google wants to roll this out to Apps users before general Gmail users.

That'll be a first. Historically, Google has deeply neglected Apps users. My Apps account didn't get G+ until almost a year after it became generally available.

Re: Gmail: Introducing Actions in the Inbox

#70
post #65
post #37

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The feature appears to be independently implementable in other clients, so if it takes off and those badges start appearing, then other e-mail clients can follow. And some "designed for gmail" badges may actually be a good thing — maybe that would force Microsoft to do something with grotesque HTML rendering in the latest Outlook.

MS uses the Word HTML engine in Outlook since Office 2007. As well, CSS (even inlined) support when viewing mail seems to be pretty bad. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Outlook#HTML_renderin...

Campaign Monitor has a pretty great table[1] describing what's supported where.

[1] http://www.campaignmonitor.com/css/

Post reply on HN