Live data from Hacker News

Code Reads

ashkenas.com

61–70 of 89 posts

Re: Code Reads

#61
post #9

Earlier quoted context omitted.

http://codereview.stackexchange.com/

How will this work with SE's infamous hatred of discussion threads? I'd imagine posts about code style would generate multiple "right" answers with lots of discussion to be had?

That's mostly Stack Overflow, not Exchange. If a Stack Exchange is appropriate for discussion, they're fine with it.

Re: Code Reads

#62
post #40
post #34

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Maybe fork Discourse? Naturally this would eliminate the crazyness that issues with every SE discussion. I can help.

On a semi-related note, it's silly how there isn't a "canonical" StackOverflow-like site for open discussions yet.

Slate.co looks like it could evolve into a viable contender in this space. I have a few qualms about the way questions are structured, but the site is pretty and nice enough.

Re: Code Reads

#63
post #4

Just curious: how much do such prolific programmers usually charge? (Hourly/daily/etc.)

Sam Soffes of Cheddar fame charges $1000 per hour. http://hire.samsoff.es/

That says nothing about wether Sam ever got paid $1000 per hour or not.

Judging by a post on his blog* I doubt that his was very lucrative for him.

* http://soff.es/changes

Re: Code Reads

#64
post #58

Don't take this the wrong way, but why would I want you to review my code? I would consider adding a few "achievements" like: * I've worked on JS for x years. * I've written client-side JS for x companies. Anyway, you get the idea.

Agreed.

The HN effect only lasts for so long. Once the flash crowd evaporates, prospects need more than such an unvarnished offer before they can act.

Cozy up to your prospects. Release some educational content. Give some examples of how you deliver value with your code reviews.

Going forward, a testimonial strategy definitely wouldn't hurt.

Re: Code Reads

#65
post #40
post #34

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Maybe fork Discourse? Naturally this would eliminate the crazyness that issues with every SE discussion. I can help.

On a semi-related note, it's silly how there isn't a "canonical" StackOverflow-like site for open discussions yet.

Reddit comes close. I don't know that there can really be a 'canonical' discussion site, any more than there can be a canonical Q&A site (Stack Overflow is not that, given the existence of Quora, Yahoo Answers, etc. serving other large niches of Q&A).

Re: Code Reads

#66
post #22

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Maybe because of the fact that bots usually scan the href attribute, but not the onclick attribute?

I would think any self respecting bot would notice "Hey, there's a valid email address on the page source code :D".

If someone has coded up a "self respecting bot" then I think we've lost all hope against the spam harvesters (unless, of course, that bot's notion of self respect includes the recognition that spam is annoying to innocent people :)

Re: Code Reads

#67
post #64
post #58

Don't take this the wrong way, but why would I want you to review my code? I would consider adding a few "achievements" like: * I've worked on JS for x years. * I've written client-side JS for x companies. Anyway, you get the idea.

Agreed. The HN effect only lasts for so long. Once the flash crowd evaporates, prospects need more than such an unvarnished offer before they can act. Cozy up to your prospects. Release some educational content. Give some examples of how you deliver value with your code reviews. Going forward, a testimonial strategy definitely wouldn't hurt.

> Release some educational content.

Like very well documented and widely used compiler of some language to JavaScript, perhaps?

Re: Code Reads

#68

Holy moly. Didn't expect to see this at the top of HN. Went to grab some dinner, and the ol' inbox is already starting to fill up. Thanks for the warm response. To illuminate the rationale a bit more ... A lot of folks have asked for quick "gut checks", "sanity checks", and similar overviews of their codebases in the past, and this seems like a way to: 1) Help folks out in a way that doesn't entail a massive commitme…

"And although Code Reads will be entirely confidential, if any of the companies are interested in sharing theirs (perhaps to attract recruits) -- maybe I'll be able to post one or two up publicly."

Can you take a high-profile public project (like coffeescript or underscore/lodash or angularjs) and do a code read? (yes I'm aware that you are the man behind coffeescript and underscorejs but I'm sure you can find something in a code read)

Re: Code Reads

#69
post #68

Holy moly. Didn't expect to see this at the top of HN. Went to grab some dinner, and the ol' inbox is already starting to fill up. Thanks for the warm response. To illuminate the rationale a bit more ... A lot of folks have asked for quick "gut checks", "sanity checks", and similar overviews of their codebases in the past, and this seems like a way to: 1) Help folks out in a way that doesn't entail a massive commitme…

"And although Code Reads will be entirely confidential, if any of the companies are interested in sharing theirs (perhaps to attract recruits) -- maybe I'll be able to post one or two up publicly." Can you take a high-profile public project (like coffeescript or underscore/lodash or angularjs) and do a code read? (yes I'm aware that you are the man behind coffeescript and underscorejs but I'm sure you can find someth…

Tom Dale made a tweet about submitting Ember (as a joke, presumably), but I saw at least one "Do it!" reply.

I'll admit, it would amuse me.

Re: Code Reads

#70
post #53

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Still open to explanations of why ninjas have an enhanced coding ability though. Do they? Seeing that you can't actually see ninjas, how can you see they have an enhanced coding ability? ;)

When you get into the office, and your code has seemingly magically improved with no explanation visible in your git log, it's ninjas.

merge conflict due to ninja throwing stars
Post reply on HN