Earlier quoted context omitted.
> If it's a "mild inconvenience", surely you won't mind paying for n instances, for non-trivial n. For all crimes there is a false search rate. A good example is a normal drug "bust" or a stolen property bust. And yes - with the enforcement of most laws there is an inconvenience. A good example is a traffic stop - they check your license, check if the driver is drunk, check if the car is stolen, check for outstanding…
I'm not questioning that it's an inconvenience or that there will be false positives. I'm pointing out that "mild" is inaccurate. In ducking my question of how many of these "mild inconveniences" you're willing to pay for, you concede that point. Let me suggest that the more costly the inconvenience, the lower the acceptable false positive rate. And, if the inconvenience is serious enough, the folks inconvenienced sh…
Re: The dangers of operating a Tor exit node
#61In most countries, if the police performs any raid on your premises all costs (e.g. fixing doors) are paid for by the state. I also doubt that the cost of doors is that high (compared to other expenses).