Live data from Hacker News

A 386 PC for Your RP2350

github.com

61–64 of 64 posts

Re: A 386 PC for Your RP2350

#61
post #55

Looks like it can even run Windows 96. Incredibly cool. I'll have to try if it runs my old Slackware kernal 1.2.13 some time. I used it with a 4MiB, 25Mhz 386 DX back in the time, so it should.

I don't know if they have some kind of magically genius caching system but the chip only has 512kb of SRAM and a little cache and the rest has to be managed by flash memory which is like 30+ times slower so I dunno about the performance of that.

The boards using this chip typically have 8 MB of PSRAM from what I've seen.

Re: A 386 PC for Your RP2350

#62
post #39

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You certainly did not, as Win95 requires 32-bit, 80386 or better. 286 was a 16-bit CPU.

Windows 95 had a beta build for 286 systems, which is what this system 'ran.' Bet you don't even know about Windows 97.

It did not and it wouldn't have made any sense. By the time Windows 95 came out 286 systems were obsolete. They could barely run Windows 3.

Re: A 386 PC for Your RP2350

#63
post #55

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't know if they have some kind of magically genius caching system but the chip only has 512kb of SRAM and a little cache and the rest has to be managed by flash memory which is like 30+ times slower so I dunno about the performance of that.

The boards using this chip typically have 8 MB of PSRAM from what I've seen.

yeah but the PSRAM is going to cause a delay

Re: A 386 PC for Your RP2350

#64

Which of the 4 boards on do you recommend as easiest? I would love to demo at the Computer Museum @ System Source https://museum.sysrc.com It looks like I would have to build my own frank board. Any off the shelf boards?

To save anyone the Google, there's an S missing from the URL.

https://museum.syssrc.com/

Post reply on HN