Live data from Hacker News

Felony charges for citizen deleting phone data at US Border

nytimes.com

61–70 of 1001 posts

Re: Felony charges for citizen deleting phone data at US Border

#62
post #14

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Oh, they may well give you bad time if your phone looks like a burner with too little content.

If you are a citizen it doesn’t matter. They have to let you in.

Wouldn’t be the first time the US government grossly abused its own citizens and violated their rights

Re: Felony charges for citizen deleting phone data at US Border

#63
post #14
post #12

Yet another case that will waste the court's time and money. All this is doing is keeping defense lawyers pocket's lined. At this point, people should buy a burner phone when going to/from the US. In that phone only have a couple of phone numbers and that's it.

Oh, they may well give you bad time if your phone looks like a burner with too little content.

This is not... advice. But if anyone's actually going to do this, the method that's worked for me...

A couple weeks before your trip, factory reset whatever burner phone you're planning on using and swap your SIM card over. Install a few basic apps you wouldn't mind them looking through. Enable hotspot/tethering, and connect your other phone via Wi-Fi.

For a couple of weeks, use the burner as much as you can with what is available on it. When you're driving, us the maps app for GPS. Make and receive some calls, ignore some spam calls. Read the news. Get a few inane text messages conversations going, etc.

When you travel, leave your regular phone at home and take the burner. When it's searched at the border, it has enough activity to pass most initial smell tests. If asked, you dropped your other phone and didn't have time to get it fixed before your trip, this is one a friend lent you.

This has worked for me. Never _actually_ into anything illegal, but just apparently had a suspicious vibe about me or something because every time I crossed the border into or out of the country I was spending 4-5 hours getting searched. Didn't need someone going through my entire life going back decades every time--once was enough.

Re: Felony charges for citizen deleting phone data at US Border

#64
post #58

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Evidence of what? Destroying evidence assumes he is guilty of a crime which there be evidence of. Our system is predicated on an assumption of innocence. The normal threshold to accuse is a "reasonable, articulable suspicion." This does not meet that criteria.

Well that's the thing with destroying evidence. If you destroyed it, it becomes harder (or impossible) to prove you did the crime. That's why it's not uncommon for people to be only charged with stuff like "obstruction of justice" rather than the actual crime they allegedly did.

But you can't assume someone committed a crime.

Re: Felony charges for citizen deleting phone data at US Border

#65
post #44
post #30

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>Amendment 4: He was charged for destroying evidence, not refusing a search >Amendment 5: Destroying evidence isn't testimony. Moreover he would have been in the clear if he just kept his mouth shut.

"Evidence" of what, exactly? What specific crime did they expect to find evidence of on his phone?

They were pretty obviously hoping to find a specific crime to accuse him of (because he is a protester against the Atlanta "Cop City" thing).

But no respectable judge would ever have issued a search warrant on the basis of "we want to rifle through his messages/contacts so we can hopefully accuse him of something".

Protesters against this exact same thing were mis-prosecuted under "domestic terrorism" and "racketeering" charges before (got dismissed in 2025).

Re: Felony charges for citizen deleting phone data at US Border

#68
post #21

Amendment 4: "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized." Amendment 5: "..nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witn…

you don't have those protections at the border: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Border_search_exception

Re: Felony charges for citizen deleting phone data at US Border

#69

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There is a difference between exploding a bomb and deleting your data. One is a crime.

Deleting your data is absolutely a crime when you know the authorities could've wanted whatever it was you deleted -- even if they haven't told you yet. It stands to reason that providing a duress PIN that deletes your data when entered would be a crime as well, if said data is of interest. Not to say that I personally agree with either of those cases. But what is considered crime can get pretty unfair when it comes…

> when it comes to the authorities thinking you did something wrong

Did they though? Was there an actual investigation going on?

Re: Felony charges for citizen deleting phone data at US Border

#70
post #9

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Knowingly providing a PIN that would erase evidence is going to get tough in court. But the man was also hated by the cops because of his activism. They were going to catch him for something, some day. This incident just provided the necessary excuse to lock him up.

How can they prove that? What if it was a glitch?

Right, the halting problem means one can hardly prove anything at all when it comes to software.
Post reply on HN