61–66 of 66 posts
The fact that they put "every model" repeatedly, then don't actually support even close to "most mainstream models", makes me highly doubtful their service will be more honest and forthcoming once I'm signed up.
I wouldn't read too much into it, that was probably a big rush job once the Stripe / openrouter news broke.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
>InnovationHQ.com Their site is a totally blank HTML page, it seems?
Yes, that’s how you know they’re rich rich. They’re so rich they don’t care about having a website. The reputable brokers know who they are, the serious buyers will get a message to them.
Also -- offtopic but I think it's funny -- for conformance, you need a doctype and a (non-empty) title. So the above isn't valid, but this is:
blehEarlier quoted context omitted.
>InnovationHQ.com Their site is a totally blank HTML page, it seems?
Yes, that’s how you know they’re rich rich. They’re so rich they don’t care about having a website. The reputable brokers know who they are, the serious buyers will get a message to them.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think you mean landlords, not squatters. Squatters are the people who occupy owned property without permission, landlords are the people who hold property, do nothing, and collect profit.
In the context of domains, a domain squatter would be more like someone who holds and keeps a domain without any intention of actually using it or taking it knowing someone else might have use of that exact name, they just want to sell it later for more money. In real-life I agree with your definition though, I guess it not 100% comparable, bad name that got stuck.