Live data from Hacker News

Has the hallucination problem in AI been solved?

news.ycombinator.com

61–62 of 62 posts

Re: Has the hallucination problem in AI been solved?

#61
post #57
post #28

You have to be specific. You only have vague comments about your own thoughts. We had this discussion with Tomahawks in the ninetees, it is not an easy one. This is like answering how long is a string. IMHO This feels like a troll, OP have several comments about evil Ukrainian AI drones. I feel it is hard to have a naunced discussion if you only diss one part. Your question is asking for easy technical opinions about…

A couple of things to clarify: I can understand how you see it that way because I wasn't clear enough. I don't beleive I characterized what I'm asking in the way you are putting it. I never said that Ukraine is evil. I competely support and stand with the Ukranian Government and it's people, and I think we, as a country, should be supporting them and their fight to not be conqoured. Clearly, if I post on a technical…

As I said you need to be specific, I am sorry for derailing the discussion. What part of AI is the problem?

I honestly think it will be impossible to block the use of AI in weapons because you can not know where to draw the line.

Re: Has the hallucination problem in AI been solved?

#62

We can check it by asking it about the topics we knew. If it says correct many times , then it has less chance of assuming that this model hallucinates. If it gives wrong answer many times we can take it as frequently hallucinating model.

That’s wasting tokens
Post reply on HN