Earlier quoted context omitted.
In 1990, I was using the BRIEF editor on MS-DOS, which was an editor for programmers and which was quite similar to Emacs (also including a scripting language somewhat similar to LISP). BRIEF must have already existed for some years. It had a completely configurable auto-complete, which I rewrote to insert big code templates in the languages that I was using (C, C++, Fortran, Basic, assembly), covering almost all boi…
You can always recreate it for Windows or Linux. Perfect hobby hehe
I have not used BRIEF for Windows, so I do not know if it was as good as BRIEF for MS-DOS. Unfortunately, most of the great MS-DOS programs had versions ported to Windows that were quite disappointing.
This allowed Microsoft to create competitive Windows products that grabbed the market from the former MS-DOS market leaders, like with Microsoft Office. Of course, Microsoft cheated in many cases, because its internal developers frequently used Windows OS interfaces that were not yet known to outsiders because they were planned for the next Windows release or interfaces that were undocumented and which remained undocumented, unless someone reverse engineered them.