The infinite scroll may become endangered if controversial Calif. law passes
61–70 of 464 posts
Re: The infinite scroll may become endangered if controversial Calif. law passes
#62Curious as to where the line between “addictive feature” and "good UX" is. Is deliberate pagination actual impedance to use or merely an annoyance that's been weeded out with modern UX design? When does a feature that simply makes your product easier to use cross into a territory that it's illegal? What about media previews, in a platform like reddit if you can preview or expand media directly from the main list is t…
Re: The infinite scroll may become endangered if controversial Calif. law passes
#63Re: The infinite scroll may become endangered if controversial Calif. law passes
#64Earlier quoted context omitted.
While that's true I think that once the feed has been observed in a certain way the advantages of stability outweigh the advantages of showing a tweaked version the second time it is loaded.
The user expectation is that if you refresh the page, you will see fresh content.
if i refresh the page it should be almost the same. maybe a couple new things at the very top, but i should still be able to find the thing i was just looking at.
by comparison, facebook auto-reloads while you're halfway down a page, and wont show you any of the same things. its an incredibly poor experience
Re: The infinite scroll may become endangered if controversial Calif. law passes
#65Re: The infinite scroll may become endangered if controversial Calif. law passes
#66Re: The infinite scroll may become endangered if controversial Calif. law passes
#67Re: The infinite scroll may become endangered if controversial Calif. law passes
#68Re: The infinite scroll may become endangered if controversial Calif. law passes
#69Re: The infinite scroll may become endangered if controversial Calif. law passes
#70Don't most people have AI agent that consumes the infinite scroll and then presents a custom summarization? I don't see how this ban is a good idea.